Pacific Choice Seafood Company et al v. Pritzker et al

Filing 19

ORDER by Judge Charles R. Breyer. Having considered the motion to consider whether cases should be related (15-cv-5572HSG to 10-cv-4790CRB), the Court hereby determines that: the two cases are not related. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 1/12/2016. (beS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/13/2016)

1

[Submitted by:]

2

JOHN C. CRUDEN
Assistant Attorney General
Environment and Natural Resources Division
United States Department of Justice
SETH M. BARSKY, Section Chief
Wildlife and Marine Resources Section
KRISTEN GUSTAFSON, Assistant Section Chief
BRIDGET KENNEDY McNEIL, CO Bar # 34299
Senior Trial Attorney
999 18th St., Suite 370
Denver, CO 80202
[phone]
[phone] (fax)
[e-mail]

3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12

Attorneys for Federal Defendants in
Pacific Choice Seafood Company v. Pritzker, Case
No 3:15-cv-5572-HSG

13
14
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
NORTHERN DIVISION

15
16
17
18

PACFIC COAST FED’N OF FISHERMEN’S
ASSOCIATIONS, et al.,
No. 3:10-cv-04790-CRB

19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

Plaintiffs,
v.
GARY LOCKE, et al.,
Defendants.

ORDER RE:
ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO
CONSIDER WHETHER CASES SHOULD
BE RELATED

Pending before this Court is an Administrative Motion to Consider Whether Cases

1
2
3

Should Be Related, pursuant to Civil L.R. 3-12, concerning. Having considered the motion and
all responses and replies thereto, the Court hereby determines that:

4
5
6

[ ]

The two cases are related.

[X]

The two cases are not related.

7
8
9

Dated this 12th day of January, 2016

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

The Honorable Charles R. Breyer
Senior United States District Judge