Pacific Choice Seafood Company et al v. Pritzker et al

Filing 47

ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 45 Unopposed Motion to Reschedule Case Management Conference. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/2/2016)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 EDWARD C. DUCKERS (SB #242113) ed.duckers@stoel.com STOEL RIVES LLP Three Embarcadero Center, Suite 1120 San Francisco, CA 94111 Telephone: (415) 617-8900 Facsimile: (415) 617-8907 RYAN P. STEEN (admitted pro hac vice) ryan.steen@stoel.com JEFFREY W. LEPPO (admitted pro hac vice) jeffrey.leppo@stoel.com STOEL RIVES LLP 600 University Street, Suite 3600 Seattle, WA 98101 Telephone: (206) 386-7610 Facsimile: (206) 386-7500 Attorneys for Plaintiffs Pacific Choice Seafood Company; Sea Princess, LLC; Pacific Fishing, LLC 12 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 14 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 15 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 16 17 PACIFIC CHOICE SEAFOOD COMPANY; SEA PRINCESS, LLC; PACIFIC FISHING, LLC, Case No. 15-cv-05572-HSG ORDER RE: PLAINTIFFS’ UNOPPOSED MOTION TO RESCHEDULE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE 18 Plaintiffs, 19 v. 20 21 Administrative Procedure Act Case PENNY PRITZKER, U.S. SECRETARY OF COMMERCE; NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE, 22 Defendants. 23 24 25 26 Pending before this Court is Plaintiffs’ Unopposed Motion to Reschedule Case Management Conference filed in accordance with Civ. L.R. 16-2(d). Having considered the 27 28 S TOE L R IVES LLP ATTO RNEY S AT LAW SAN FRA NCI S CO [PROPOSED] ORDER Case No. 15-cv-05572-HSG 87430354.1 0052902-00014 -1- 1 unopposed motion, this Court hereby determines that the Case Management Conference presently 2 scheduled for August 16, 2016 will be rescheduled for August 30, 2016. 3 4 Dated this 2nd day of August, 2016. 5 6 The Honorable Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. United States District Court Judge 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 S TOE L R IVES LLP ATTO RNEY S AT LAW SAN FRA NCI S CO [PROPOSED] ORDER Case No. 15-cv-05572-HSG 87430354.1 0052902-00014 -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?