Pacific Choice Seafood Company et al v. Pritzker et al
Filing
47
ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 45 Unopposed Motion to Reschedule Case Management Conference. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/2/2016)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
EDWARD C. DUCKERS (SB #242113)
ed.duckers@stoel.com
STOEL RIVES LLP
Three Embarcadero Center, Suite 1120
San Francisco, CA 94111
Telephone: (415) 617-8900
Facsimile: (415) 617-8907
RYAN P. STEEN (admitted pro hac vice)
ryan.steen@stoel.com
JEFFREY W. LEPPO (admitted pro hac vice)
jeffrey.leppo@stoel.com
STOEL RIVES LLP
600 University Street, Suite 3600
Seattle, WA 98101
Telephone: (206) 386-7610
Facsimile: (206) 386-7500
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
Pacific Choice Seafood Company; Sea Princess, LLC;
Pacific Fishing, LLC
12
13
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
14
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
15
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
16
17
PACIFIC CHOICE SEAFOOD COMPANY;
SEA PRINCESS, LLC; PACIFIC FISHING,
LLC,
Case No. 15-cv-05572-HSG
ORDER RE: PLAINTIFFS’ UNOPPOSED
MOTION TO RESCHEDULE CASE
MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
18
Plaintiffs,
19
v.
20
21
Administrative Procedure Act Case
PENNY PRITZKER, U.S. SECRETARY OF
COMMERCE; NATIONAL MARINE
FISHERIES SERVICE,
22
Defendants.
23
24
25
26
Pending before this Court is Plaintiffs’ Unopposed Motion to Reschedule Case
Management Conference filed in accordance with Civ. L.R. 16-2(d). Having considered the
27
28
S TOE L R IVES LLP
ATTO RNEY S AT LAW
SAN FRA NCI S CO
[PROPOSED] ORDER
Case No. 15-cv-05572-HSG
87430354.1 0052902-00014
-1-
1
unopposed motion, this Court hereby determines that the Case Management Conference presently
2
scheduled for August 16, 2016 will be rescheduled for August 30, 2016.
3
4
Dated this 2nd day of August, 2016.
5
6
The Honorable Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr.
United States District Court Judge
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
S TOE L R IVES LLP
ATTO RNEY S AT LAW
SAN FRA NCI S CO
[PROPOSED] ORDER
Case No. 15-cv-05572-HSG
87430354.1 0052902-00014
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?