Pacific Choice Seafood Company et al v. Pritzker et al

Filing 57

ORDER REGARDING 54 REQUEST TO EXPAND MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT PAGE LIMITS. Signed by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. on 8/31/2016. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/31/2016)

1
2
3
4

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

5

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

6
7

PACIFIC CHOICE SEAFOOD COMPANY,
et al.,
Plaintiffs,

8
9
10

v.
PENNY PRITZKER, et al.,

ORDER REGARDING REQUEST TO
EXPAND MOTION FOR SUMMARY
JUDGMENT PAGE LIMITS
Re: Dkt. No. 54

Defendants.

11
United States District Court
Northern District of California

Case No. 15-cv-05572-HSG

12
13

On August 22, 2016, the parties filed a joint case management statement requesting that

14

the Court expand the page limits on the opening and reply briefs to their cross-motions for

15

summary judgment. Dkt. No. 54 ¶ 21.

16

The Court hereby GRANTS the request with these modifications:

17



Plaintiffs’ Motion for Summary Judgment will be limited to 35 pages;

18



Defendants’ Combined Response and Cross-Motion will be limited to 35 pages;

19



Plaintiffs’ Combined Response and Reply will be limited to 20 pages; and

20



Defendants’ Reply will be limited to 10 pages.

21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: 8/31/2016
______________________________________
HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR.
United States District Judge