Julie Davenport v. Gracenote, Inc. et al

Filing 31

STIPULATION AND ORDER Requesting Dismissal with Prejudice. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 8/29/16. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/29/2016)

1
2
3
4

Rory C. Quintana (SBN 258747)
QUINTANA HANAFI
PUNGPRAKEARTI, LLP
351 California St., Ste. 300
San Francisco, CA 94104
Telephone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
[e-mail]

5
6
7
8
9

Monique Olivier (SBN 190385)
DUCKWORTH PETERS
LEBOWITZ OLIVIER LLP
100 Bush St., Ste. 1800
San Francisco, CA 94104
Telephone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
[e-mail]

10
Attorneys for Plaintiff
11

15

Mark S. Spring, SBN 155114
[e-mail]
Nicole A. Legrottaglie, SBN 271416
CAROTHERS DISANTE & FREUDENBERGER LLP
900 University Avenue, Suite 200
Sacramento, CA 95825
Telephone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]

16

Attorneys for Defendants

12
13
14

17
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
18
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
19
20

JULIE DAVENPORT, an individual,
Plaintiff,

21
22
23
24
25

CASE NO.: 3:15-cv-05573

v.

STIPULATION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF’S
CLAIMS WITH PREJUDICE; [PROPOSED]
ORDER GRANTING DISMISSAL WITH
PREJUDICE [FRCP 41(a)(2)]

GRACENOTE, INC., a Delaware
corporation; TRIBUNE COMPANY d.b.a.
TRIBUNE MEDIA, a Delaware corporation;
Judge:
Hon. Richard Seeborg
and DOES 1 through 10, inclusive,
Action Filed: December 4, 2015
Defendants.

26
27
28

WHEREAS, Plaintiff Julie Davenport (herein “Plaintiff”) and Defendants Gracenote,
Inc. and Tribune Company (herein “Defendants”) (collectively, “the Parties”) have agreed to
1
Case No.: 3:15-cv-05573

STIPULATED REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL

1

fully settle the instant action and have entered into a settlement;

2

NOW THEREFORE, the Parties hereby jointly and respectfully request that the Court,

3

pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1), discontinue and dismiss with prejudice the

4

above-titled action as to all parties, with each party bearing his or its own fees and costs.

5

Dated: August 25, 2016

6

Respectfully submitted,
QHP, LLP

7

By:___s/Rory C. Quintana__________
Rory C. Quintana
Attorney for Plaintiff

8
9
10
11
12

Dated: August 25, 2016

13

Respectfully submitted,
CAROTHERS DISANTE &
FREUDENBERGER, LLP

14
15

By:___s/Mark Spring__________
Mark Spring
Attorney for Defendants

16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

2
Case No.: 3:15-cv-05573

STIPULATED REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL

1

[PROPOSED] ORDER

2

Having been advised by the Parties that a Settlement Agreement and Release of All

3

Claims was entered into, and having been requested to enter dismissal with prejudice by the

4

parties, the matter Davenport v. Gracenote Inc., et al., United States District Court, Northern

5

District of California, Case No. CV 3:15-cv-05573, is, HEREBY DISMISSED, with prejudice in

6

its entirety as to all parties, pursuant to the parties’ stipulation.

7
8

IT IS SO ORDERED.

9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11
12
13

Dated: ___________________
8/29/16

14

________________________________________
Hon. Richard Seeborg
United States District Court Judge

15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
Case No.: 3:15-cv-05573

STIPULATED REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL