Harris v. Lake County et al

Filing 16

ORDER REVOKING IN FORMA PAUPERIS STATUS ON APPEAL. Signed by Judge Alsup on 3/8/2016. (whalc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/8/2016)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 10 JAMES LA VELL HARRIS, Plaintiff, 11 12 13 No. C 15-05580 WHA v. LAKE COUNTY, ET AL., ORDER REVOKING IN FORMA PAUPERIS STATUS ON APPEAL Defendant. 14 / 15 16 A previous order dismissed plaintiff James Harris’ pro se complaint as plainly frivolous 17 and allowed him to seek leave to amend (Dkt. No. 10). The complaint alleged that plaintiff is a 18 lifetime user of marijuana and that defendants Lake County Sheriff’s Department and several of 19 its officers discriminated against him by failing to provide him with marijuana while he was in 20 jail. The order dismissing the complaint also noted that plaintiff is no stranger to the federal 21 courts and has filed several civil actions in this district alleging that the Lake County Sheriff’s 22 Department denied him “access to and the use of both spiritual and medical marijuana” (Compl. 23 at ¶28). 24 Now, our court of appeals has referred plaintiff’s appeal to the district court to determine 25 whether plaintiff’s in forma pauperis status should continue on appeal. In Hooker v. American 26 Airlines, 302 F.3d 1091, 1092 (9th Cir. 2002), our court of appeals held that revocation of IFP 27 status is appropriate where the district court finds the appeal to be frivolous. Based on 28 plaintiff’s allegations, his declination to seek leave to amend his complaint, and his pattern of 1 filing frivolous lawsuits, this order finds plaintiff’s appeal to be frivolous and hereby REVOKES 2 PLAINTIFF’S IFP STATUS. 3 Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The CLERK SHALL PLEASE SERVE THIS ORDER on the United States 4 5 IT IS SO ORDERED. 6 7 Dated: March 8, 2016. WILLIAM ALSUP UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 8 9 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?