Harris v. Lake County et al
Filing
16
ORDER REVOKING IN FORMA PAUPERIS STATUS ON APPEAL. Signed by Judge Alsup on 3/8/2016. (whalc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/8/2016)
1
2
3
4
5
6
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
10
JAMES LA VELL HARRIS,
Plaintiff,
11
12
13
No. C 15-05580 WHA
v.
LAKE COUNTY, ET AL.,
ORDER REVOKING IN FORMA
PAUPERIS STATUS ON APPEAL
Defendant.
14
/
15
16
A previous order dismissed plaintiff James Harris’ pro se complaint as plainly frivolous
17
and allowed him to seek leave to amend (Dkt. No. 10). The complaint alleged that plaintiff is a
18
lifetime user of marijuana and that defendants Lake County Sheriff’s Department and several of
19
its officers discriminated against him by failing to provide him with marijuana while he was in
20
jail. The order dismissing the complaint also noted that plaintiff is no stranger to the federal
21
courts and has filed several civil actions in this district alleging that the Lake County Sheriff’s
22
Department denied him “access to and the use of both spiritual and medical marijuana” (Compl.
23
at ¶28).
24
Now, our court of appeals has referred plaintiff’s appeal to the district court to determine
25
whether plaintiff’s in forma pauperis status should continue on appeal. In Hooker v. American
26
Airlines, 302 F.3d 1091, 1092 (9th Cir. 2002), our court of appeals held that revocation of IFP
27
status is appropriate where the district court finds the appeal to be frivolous. Based on
28
plaintiff’s allegations, his declination to seek leave to amend his complaint, and his pattern of
1
filing frivolous lawsuits, this order finds plaintiff’s appeal to be frivolous and hereby REVOKES
2
PLAINTIFF’S IFP STATUS.
3
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.
The CLERK SHALL PLEASE SERVE THIS ORDER on the United States
4
5
IT IS SO ORDERED.
6
7
Dated: March 8, 2016.
WILLIAM ALSUP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
8
9
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?