Peterson et al v. Bank of America , N.A. et al

Filing 48

ORDER, Trans Union LLC terminated. Granted Motion: 47 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE filed by Trans Union LLC. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 4/12/2016. (beS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/13/2016)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 Scott E. Brady, Esq. (IN #30534-49) (admitted Pro Hac Vice) Schuckit & Associates, P.C. 4545 Northwestern Drive Zionsville, IN 46077 Telephone: 317-363-2400 Fax: 317-363-2257 E-Mail: sbrady@schuckitlaw.com 5 Lead Counsel for Defendant Trans Union, LLC 6 10 Lauren E. Tate, Esq. (CSB #124483) Tate &th Associates 1321 8 Street, Suite 4 Berkeley, CA 94710 Telephone: 510-525-5100 Fax: 510-525-5130 E-Mail: ltate@tateandassociates-law.com 11 Local Counsel for Defendant Trans Union, LLC 7 8 9 12 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 14 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 15 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 16 17 18 19 20 21 JUSTIN S. PETERSON and JANNA A. PETERSON, Plaintiffs, vs. BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.; TRANS UNION, LLC; EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC.; and EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES, LLC; Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO. 3:15-cv-05645-CRB STIPULATION AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE BETWEEN PLAINTIFFS AND DEFENDANT TRANS UNION, LLC ONLY 22 23 Plaintiffs Justin S. Peterson and Janna A. Peterson (“Plaintiffs”), by counsel, and 24 Defendant Trans Union, LLC (“Trans Union”), by counsel, hereby stipulate and agree that all 25 matters herein between them have been compromised and settled, and that Plaintiffs’ cause 26 against Trans Union only should be dismissed, with prejudice, with each party to bear its own 27 costs and attorneys’ fees. 28 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE BETWEEN PLAINTIFFS AND DEFENDANT TRANS UNION, LLC ONLY – 3:15-CV-05645-CRB Page 1 of 3 Respectfully submitted, 1 2 3 Date: April 6, 2016 4 5 6 7 8 s/ Mark F. Anderson (with consent) Mark F. Anderson, Esq. (44787) Anderson, Ogilvie & Brewer, LLP 235 Montgomery Street, Suite 914 San Francisco, CO 94104 Telephone: 415-651-1951 Fax: 415-956-3233 E-Mail: mark@aoblawyers.com Counsel for Justin S. Peterson and Janna A. Peterson 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 Date: April 7, 2016 s/ Scott E. Brady Scott E. Brady, Esq. (IN #30534-49) (admitted Pro Hac Vice) Schuckit & Associates, P.C. 4545 Northwestern Drive Zionsville, IN 46077 Telephone: 317-363-2400 Fax: 317-363-2257 E-Mail: sbrady@schuckitlaw.com Lead Counsel for Defendant Trans Union, LLC 18 22 Lauren E. Tate, Esq. (CSB #124483) Tate &th Associates 1321 8 Street, Suite 4 Berkeley, CA 94710 Telephone: 510-525-5100 Fax: 510-525-5130 E-Mail: ltate@tateandassociates-law.com 23 Local Counsel for Defendant Trans Union, LLC 19 20 21 24 25 26 Pursuant to Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), I attest that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from each of the Signatories. 27 28 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE BETWEEN PLAINTIFFS AND DEFENDANT TRANS UNION, LLC ONLY – 3:15-CV-05645-CRB Page 2 of 3 1 ORDER 2 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED that all claims of Plaintiffs 3 Justin S. Peterson and Janna A. Peterson against Defendant Trans Union, LLC are dismissed, 4 with prejudice. Plaintiffs Justin S. Peterson and Janna A. Peterson and Defendant Trans Union, 5 LLC shall each bear their own costs and attorneys’ fees. 6 7 Date: April 12, 2016 8 ____________________________________ JUDGE, United States District Court, Northern District of California 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 DISTRIBUTION TO: Mark F. Anderson, Esq. mark@aoblawyers.com Jason M. Richardson, Esq. jmr@severson.com Alexandra A. McDonald, Esq. amcdonald@jonesday.com Mark J. Kenney, Esq. mjk@severson.com Scott E. Brady, Esq. sbrady@schuckitlaw.com Lauren E. Tate, Esq. ltate@tateandassociates-law.com Thomas P. Quinn, Esq. tquinn@nokesquinn.com 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE BETWEEN PLAINTIFFS AND DEFENDANT TRANS UNION, LLC ONLY – 3:15-CV-05645-CRB Page 3 of 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?