Peterson et al v. Bank of America , N.A. et al
Filing
48
ORDER, Trans Union LLC terminated. Granted Motion: 47 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE filed by Trans Union LLC. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 4/12/2016. (beS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/13/2016)
1
2
3
4
Scott E. Brady, Esq. (IN #30534-49)
(admitted Pro Hac Vice)
Schuckit & Associates, P.C.
4545 Northwestern Drive
Zionsville, IN 46077
Telephone: 317-363-2400
Fax: 317-363-2257
E-Mail: sbrady@schuckitlaw.com
5
Lead Counsel for Defendant Trans Union, LLC
6
10
Lauren E. Tate, Esq. (CSB #124483)
Tate &th
Associates
1321 8 Street, Suite 4
Berkeley, CA 94710
Telephone: 510-525-5100
Fax: 510-525-5130
E-Mail: ltate@tateandassociates-law.com
11
Local Counsel for Defendant Trans Union, LLC
7
8
9
12
13
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
14
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
15
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
16
17
18
19
20
21
JUSTIN S. PETERSON and JANNA A.
PETERSON,
Plaintiffs,
vs.
BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.; TRANS UNION,
LLC; EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS,
INC.; and EQUIFAX INFORMATION
SERVICES, LLC;
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
CASE NO. 3:15-cv-05645-CRB
STIPULATION AND ORDER OF
DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE
BETWEEN PLAINTIFFS AND
DEFENDANT TRANS UNION,
LLC ONLY
22
23
Plaintiffs Justin S. Peterson and Janna A. Peterson (“Plaintiffs”), by counsel, and
24
Defendant Trans Union, LLC (“Trans Union”), by counsel, hereby stipulate and agree that all
25
matters herein between them have been compromised and settled, and that Plaintiffs’ cause
26
against Trans Union only should be dismissed, with prejudice, with each party to bear its own
27
costs and attorneys’ fees.
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE BETWEEN PLAINTIFFS AND
DEFENDANT TRANS UNION, LLC ONLY – 3:15-CV-05645-CRB
Page 1 of 3
Respectfully submitted,
1
2
3
Date: April 6, 2016
4
5
6
7
8
s/ Mark F. Anderson (with consent)
Mark F. Anderson, Esq. (44787)
Anderson, Ogilvie & Brewer, LLP
235 Montgomery Street, Suite 914
San Francisco, CO 94104
Telephone: 415-651-1951
Fax: 415-956-3233
E-Mail: mark@aoblawyers.com
Counsel for Justin S. Peterson and Janna A.
Peterson
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
Date: April 7, 2016
s/ Scott E. Brady
Scott E. Brady, Esq. (IN #30534-49)
(admitted Pro Hac Vice)
Schuckit & Associates, P.C.
4545 Northwestern Drive
Zionsville, IN 46077
Telephone: 317-363-2400
Fax: 317-363-2257
E-Mail: sbrady@schuckitlaw.com
Lead Counsel for Defendant Trans Union,
LLC
18
22
Lauren E. Tate, Esq. (CSB #124483)
Tate &th
Associates
1321 8 Street, Suite 4
Berkeley, CA 94710
Telephone: 510-525-5100
Fax: 510-525-5130
E-Mail: ltate@tateandassociates-law.com
23
Local Counsel for Defendant Trans Union,
LLC
19
20
21
24
25
26
Pursuant to Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), I attest
that concurrence in the filing of this
document has been obtained from each of
the Signatories.
27
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE BETWEEN PLAINTIFFS AND
DEFENDANT TRANS UNION, LLC ONLY – 3:15-CV-05645-CRB
Page 2 of 3
1
ORDER
2
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED that all claims of Plaintiffs
3
Justin S. Peterson and Janna A. Peterson against Defendant Trans Union, LLC are dismissed,
4
with prejudice. Plaintiffs Justin S. Peterson and Janna A. Peterson and Defendant Trans Union,
5
LLC shall each bear their own costs and attorneys’ fees.
6
7
Date: April 12, 2016
8
____________________________________
JUDGE, United States District Court,
Northern District of California
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
DISTRIBUTION TO:
Mark F. Anderson, Esq.
mark@aoblawyers.com
Jason M. Richardson, Esq.
jmr@severson.com
Alexandra A. McDonald, Esq.
amcdonald@jonesday.com
Mark J. Kenney, Esq.
mjk@severson.com
Scott E. Brady, Esq.
sbrady@schuckitlaw.com
Lauren E. Tate, Esq.
ltate@tateandassociates-law.com
Thomas P. Quinn, Esq.
tquinn@nokesquinn.com
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE BETWEEN PLAINTIFFS AND
DEFENDANT TRANS UNION, LLC ONLY – 3:15-CV-05645-CRB
Page 3 of 3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?