Daniellle Parker v. Comcast Cable Communications Management, LLC et al
Filing
45
ORDER by Judge Kandis A. Westmore terminating 42 4/3/17 Discovery Letter Brief. (kawlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/10/2017)
1
2
3
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
4
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
5
6
DANIELLE PARKER,
7
Plaintiff,
8
9
10
v.
Case No. 3:15-cv-05673-TEH (KAW)
ORDER TERMINATING 4/3/17 JOINT
DISCOVERY LETTER
Re: Dkt. No. 42
COMCAST CABLE COMMUNICATIONS
MANAGEMENT, LLC,
Defendant.
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
On April 3, 2017, the parties filed a joint letter, in which Defendant seeks to compel
13
Plaintiff’s appearance for the remainder of her deposition before the upcoming April 14, 2017
14
settlement conference before Judge Laporte. (Joint Letter, Dkt. No. 42 at 1.) Thereafter, Judge
15
Laporte vacated the settlement conference pending the resolution of the joint letter. (Dkt. No. 43.)
16
Accordingly, the Court TERMINATES the joint letter and orders the parties to meet and
17
confer regarding scheduling the remainder of Plaintiff’s deposition. The parties are advised that
18
any extensions of case deadlines, including discovery cut-offs and the last date to file dispositive
19
motions, must be addressed by the presiding judge, and preferably by stipulation of the parties.
20
The Court notes that Plaintiff’s complaint regarding the difficulty in taking the deposition of key
21
defense witness Karen Pierce is not before the undersigned. (Joint Letter at 5.) That said, the
22
parties must work together to find a mutually agreeable date to take Ms. Pierce’s deposition, as
23
required by the Northern District’s Guidelines for Professional Conduct, which does not look
24
kindly upon gamesmanship. (See Northern District’s Guidelines for Professional Conduct § 3.)
25
26
27
28
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: April 10, 2017
__________________________________
KANDIS A. WESTMORE
United States Magistrate Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?