Daniellle Parker v. Comcast Cable Communications Management, LLC et al

Filing 45

ORDER by Judge Kandis A. Westmore terminating 42 4/3/17 Discovery Letter Brief. (kawlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/10/2017)

Download PDF
1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 6 DANIELLE PARKER, 7 Plaintiff, 8 9 10 v. Case No. 3:15-cv-05673-TEH (KAW) ORDER TERMINATING 4/3/17 JOINT DISCOVERY LETTER Re: Dkt. No. 42 COMCAST CABLE COMMUNICATIONS MANAGEMENT, LLC, Defendant. United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 On April 3, 2017, the parties filed a joint letter, in which Defendant seeks to compel 13 Plaintiff’s appearance for the remainder of her deposition before the upcoming April 14, 2017 14 settlement conference before Judge Laporte. (Joint Letter, Dkt. No. 42 at 1.) Thereafter, Judge 15 Laporte vacated the settlement conference pending the resolution of the joint letter. (Dkt. No. 43.) 16 Accordingly, the Court TERMINATES the joint letter and orders the parties to meet and 17 confer regarding scheduling the remainder of Plaintiff’s deposition. The parties are advised that 18 any extensions of case deadlines, including discovery cut-offs and the last date to file dispositive 19 motions, must be addressed by the presiding judge, and preferably by stipulation of the parties. 20 The Court notes that Plaintiff’s complaint regarding the difficulty in taking the deposition of key 21 defense witness Karen Pierce is not before the undersigned. (Joint Letter at 5.) That said, the 22 parties must work together to find a mutually agreeable date to take Ms. Pierce’s deposition, as 23 required by the Northern District’s Guidelines for Professional Conduct, which does not look 24 kindly upon gamesmanship. (See Northern District’s Guidelines for Professional Conduct § 3.) 25 26 27 28 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: April 10, 2017 __________________________________ KANDIS A. WESTMORE United States Magistrate Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?