Lundy v. Selene Finance, LP et al
Filing
52
ORDER GRANTING IN PART STIPULATION TO CONTINUE HEARING AND BRIEFING DEADLINES ON MOTION TO DISMISS re 45 Stipulation filed by John F. Lundy. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on February 8, 2016. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/8/2016)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7
JOHN F. LUNDY,
Case No. 15-cv-05676-JST
Plaintiff,
8
v.
9
10
SELENE FINANCE, LP, et al.,
Defendants.
Re: ECF No. 45
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
ORDER GRANTING IN PART
STIPULATION TO CONTINUE
HEARING AND BRIEFING
DEADLINES ON MOTION TO DISMISS
On February 4, 2016, Plaintiff John Lundy and Defendant JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.
13
filed a stipulation to continue all deadlines related to Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss, pending
14
settlement negotiations. ECF No. 45. They request that the deadlines for Plaintiff’s response,
15
Defendant’s reply, and the hearing date for the motion all be continued, and that if no settlement is
16
reached by March 15, 2016, Defendant will re-notice its Motion to Dismiss.
17
The stipulation is granted in part. The deadline for Plaintiff’s response is continued to
18
March 31, 2016. The deadline for Defendant’s reply is continued to April 7, 2016. The hearing
19
on the motion is continued to April 21, 2016 at 2:00 p.m.
20
The Court notes that the stipulation was filed on the same date as the original deadline for
21
Plaintiff’s response to the motion. To request a continuance of a deadline on the day of that
22
deadline is to assume that the requested relief will be granted. The parties are advised that future
23
requests for enlargements of time should be filed sufficiently in advance for the Court to give them
24
due consideration.
25
26
27
28
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: February 8, 2016
______________________________________
JON S. TIGAR
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?