Arcelus v. Killion et al

Filing 11

ORDER DISMISSING CASE. Signed by Judge James Donato on 3/17/16. (lrcS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/17/2016)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 MICHAEL SCOTT ARCELUS, Plaintiff, 8 9 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 Case No. 15-cv-05719-JD ORDER OF DISMISSAL v. WANDA KILLION, et al., Defendants. 12 13 This is a civil rights case filed pro se by a detainee being held at Napa State Hospital. The 14 Court dismissed the complaint with leave to amend after discussing its deficiencies. The twenty- 15 eight days to amend has passed and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint or otherwise 16 communicated with the Court. This case is DISMISSED for the reasons set forth in the Court’s 17 prior screening order. 18 19 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: March 17, 2016 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 JAMES DONATO United States District Judge 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 3 4 MICHAEL SCOTT ARCELUS, Case No. 15-cv-05719-JD Plaintiff, 5 v. CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 6 7 WANDA KILLION, et al., Defendants. 8 9 10 I, the undersigned, hereby certify that I am an employee in the Office of the Clerk, U.S. District Court, Northern District of California. United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 That on March 17, 2016, I SERVED a true and correct copy(ies) of the attached, by placing said copy(ies) in a postage paid envelope addressed to the person(s) hereinafter listed, by depositing said envelope in the U.S. Mail, or by placing said copy(ies) into an inter-office delivery receptacle located in the Clerk's office. 16 17 18 Michael Scott Arcelus ID: N.A. 2118214 Napa State Hospital 2100 Napa Vallejo Hwy Napa, CA 94558-6293 19 20 21 Dated: March 17, 2016 22 23 Susan Y. Soong Clerk, United States District Court 24 25 26 27 By:________________________ LISA R. CLARK, Deputy Clerk to the Honorable JAMES DONATO 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?