Sephora USA, Inc. v. Palmer, Reifler & Associates, P.A.

Filing 13

ORDER GRANTING re 11 Stipulation Pursuant to Local Rule 6-1(a) Enlarging Time to Plead Through February 8, 2016 filed by Palmer, Reifler & Associates, P.A. Signed by Chief Magistrte Judge Joseph C. Spero on 2/2/16. (klhS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/3/2016)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 DILLINGHAM & MURPHY, LLP JOHN N. DAHLBERG (SBN 85122) jnd@dillinghammurphy.com 323 Sacramento Street, Suite 2000 SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA 94111 TELEPHONE: (415) 397-2700 FACSIMILE: (415) 397-3300 ATTORNEYS FOR THE LAW OFFICES OF PALMER, REIFLER & ASSOCIATES, P.A. 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT – SAN FRANCISCO 10 11 SEPHORA USA, Inc., Plaintiff, 12 13 14 15 v. CASE NO. 3:15-cv-05750-JCS STIPULATION PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 6-1(a) ENLARGING TIME TO PLEAD THROUGH FEBRUARY 8, 2016 PALMER, REIFLER & ASSOCIATES, a Florida Corporation, Defendant. 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Case No. 3:15-cv-05750-JCS STIPULATION ENLARGING TIME TO PLEAD THROUGH FEBRUARY 8, 2016 1 The parties stipulated and agreed on or about January 5, 2016 that defendant The Law Offices 2 of Palmer, Reifler & Associates, P.A. may have through and until February 8, 2016 to answer or 3 otherwise plead to the complaint. 4 5 DATED: February 1, 2016 BRYAN CAVE LLP ADAM BREZINE 6 7 BY: 8 9 DATED: February 1, 2016 /s/ Adam Brezine _________________________________ ATTORNEYS FOR SEPHORA USA, INC. DILLINGHAM & MURPHY, LLP JOHN N. DAHLBERG 10 11 BY: 12 ER A H 18 R NIA Spero FO seph C. Judge Jo RT 17 D RDERE OO IT IS S NO 16 Dated: 2/2/16 LI 15 UNIT ED 14 ISTRIC ES D TC AT T RT U O S 13 /s/ John N. Dahlberg _________________________________ ATTORNEYS FOR THE LAW OFFICES OF PALMER, REIFLER & ASSOCIATES, P.A. N F D IS T IC T O R C 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Page No. 1 – Case No. 3:12-cv-5064 JSC STIPULATION ENALRGING TIME TO PLEAD THROUGH FEBRUARY 8, 2016

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?