Sephora USA, Inc. v. Palmer, Reifler & Associates, P.A.
Filing
13
ORDER GRANTING re 11 Stipulation Pursuant to Local Rule 6-1(a) Enlarging Time to Plead Through February 8, 2016 filed by Palmer, Reifler & Associates, P.A. Signed by Chief Magistrte Judge Joseph C. Spero on 2/2/16. (klhS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/3/2016)
1
2
3
4
5
DILLINGHAM & MURPHY, LLP
JOHN N. DAHLBERG (SBN 85122)
jnd@dillinghammurphy.com
323 Sacramento Street, Suite 2000
SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA 94111
TELEPHONE: (415) 397-2700
FACSIMILE: (415) 397-3300
ATTORNEYS FOR THE LAW OFFICES OF
PALMER, REIFLER & ASSOCIATES, P.A.
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT – SAN FRANCISCO
10
11
SEPHORA USA, Inc.,
Plaintiff,
12
13
14
15
v.
CASE NO. 3:15-cv-05750-JCS
STIPULATION PURSUANT TO LOCAL
RULE 6-1(a) ENLARGING TIME TO
PLEAD THROUGH FEBRUARY 8, 2016
PALMER, REIFLER & ASSOCIATES, a
Florida Corporation,
Defendant.
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Case No. 3:15-cv-05750-JCS
STIPULATION ENLARGING TIME TO PLEAD THROUGH FEBRUARY 8, 2016
1
The parties stipulated and agreed on or about January 5, 2016 that defendant The Law Offices
2
of Palmer, Reifler & Associates, P.A. may have through and until February 8, 2016 to answer or
3
otherwise plead to the complaint.
4
5
DATED: February 1, 2016
BRYAN CAVE LLP
ADAM BREZINE
6
7
BY:
8
9
DATED: February 1, 2016
/s/ Adam Brezine
_________________________________
ATTORNEYS FOR SEPHORA USA, INC.
DILLINGHAM & MURPHY, LLP
JOHN N. DAHLBERG
10
11
BY:
12
ER
A
H
18
R NIA
Spero
FO
seph C.
Judge Jo
RT
17
D
RDERE
OO
IT IS S
NO
16
Dated: 2/2/16
LI
15
UNIT
ED
14
ISTRIC
ES D
TC
AT
T
RT
U
O
S
13
/s/ John N. Dahlberg
_________________________________
ATTORNEYS FOR THE LAW OFFICES OF
PALMER, REIFLER & ASSOCIATES, P.A.
N
F
D IS T IC T O
R
C
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Page No. 1 – Case No. 3:12-cv-5064 JSC
STIPULATION ENALRGING TIME TO PLEAD THROUGH FEBRUARY 8, 2016
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?