Center for Biological Diversity et al v. U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service et al
ORDER VACATING HEARING re 13 MOTION to Intervene and Memorandum in Support filed by Douglas County, Oregon, National Association of Home Builders, Oregon Forest Industries Council, American Forest Resource Council, Siskiyou County, California Forestry Association, Douglas Timber Operators. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on March 14, 2016. The Case Management Conference scheduled for 3/23/2016 will remain on calendar. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/14/2016)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY,
Case No. 15-cv-05754-JST
ORDER VACATING HEARING
Re: ECF No. 13
U.S. FISH & WILDLIFE SERVICE, et al.,
Before the Court is a Motion to Intervene, filed in this Endangered Species Act case. ECF
No. 13. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 78(b) and Civil Local Rule 7-1(b), the Court
United States District Court
Northern District of California
finds the matter suitable for disposition without oral argument. The hearing on this matter,
currently scheduled for March 23, 2016, is hereby VACATED.
If, however, any party advises the Court in writing by no later than two days from the date
of this Order that most or all of the argument for its side will be conducted by a lawyer who has
been licensed to practice law for five or fewer years, and who has not previously presented
argument before this Court, then the Court will reschedule the hearing at a time that is convenient
to all parties in order to provide that opportunity. Counsel shall confer with each other, and the
party requesting the rescheduling of the hearing shall identify the upcoming available dates on the
Court’s calendar at which all counsel are available for the hearing.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: March 14, 2016
JON S. TIGAR
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?