Center for Biological Diversity et al v. U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service et al
Filing
51
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 50 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER filed by Daniel M. Ashe, U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service, Sally Jewell. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on May 31, 2016. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/31/2016)
1
2
3
4
5
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
6
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
7
8
9
10
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
No. 3:15-cv-05754-JST
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL
DIVERSITY, et al.
11
Plaintiffs,
12
v.
13
14
UNITED STATES FISH AND
WILDLIFE SERVICE, et al.,
15
Defendants
16
17
18
19
and
SISKIYOU COUNTY et al.,
Defendant Intervenors
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
)
)
[PROPOSED] SCHEDULING ORDER
Upon consideration of the Parties’ Stipulated Request for an Order Modifying Scheduling
Order, and finding good cause shown, the Court hereby sets the following case deadlines:
Event
Defendants certify, lodge, and serve the administrative record.
Deadline
June 7, 2016
Plaintiffs file any motions to supplement the administrative record for
June 28, 2016
the coastal marten not warranted finding.
28
1
1
Plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment.
2
Defendants’ combined opposition and cross-motion for summary
3
judgment.
4
Defendant-intervenors’ combined opposition and cross-motion for
5
summary judgment.
6
Plaintiffs’ combined opposition/reply.
November 16, 2016
7
Defendants’ reply.
December 21, 2016
8
Defendant-intervenors’ reply.
December 21, 2016
9
Hearing on the parties’ motions for summary judgment.
10
January 26, 2016 at
January 26, 2017
2:00 p.m., or as soon
11
thereafter as is
12
convenient for the
13
Court.
August 17, 2016
September 28, 2016
September 28, 2016
14
15
16
IT IS SO ORDERED.
17
May
31st
Dated this __________day of ____________, 2016.
18
19
20
_____________________________________________________
21
HONORABLE JON S. TIGAR
United States District Judge
United States District Court for the Northern District of California
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?