Pye v. S.C.C.D.O.C. et al
Filing
12
ORDER APPOINTING COUNSEL. Case Management Statement due by 3/29/2016. Initial Case Management Conference set for 4/5/2016 01:30 PM in Courtroom 4, 17th Floor, San Francisco. Signed by Judge Vince Chhabria on 3/4/2016. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service)(knm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/4/2016)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
George H. Pye,
Plaintiff,
vs.
S.C.C.D.O.C., et al.,
Defendants.
)
)
) Case Number: C 15-5768 VC (PR)
)
) ORDER APPOINTING COUNSEL
)
)
)
)
Because Gregory H Pye has requested and is in need of counsel to assist him in this matter
and a volunteer attorney is willing to be appointed to undertake this representation at the request of
the Federal Pro Bono Project, John-Paul Deol and Pankit Doshi of Sheppard Mullin Richter &
Hampton LLP are hereby appointed as counsel for Mr. Pye in this matter.
The scope of this referral shall be for:
X
all purposes for the duration of the case
the limited purpose of representing the litigant in the course of
mediation
early neutral evaluation
settlement conference
briefing
and hearing on the following motion (e.g., motion for
summary judgment or motion to dismiss):
__________________________________________________________
discovery as follows: ______________
other: ______________
All proceedings in this action are hereby stayed until four weeks from the date of this
order. A case management conference is scheduled for April 5, 2016 at 1:30 p.m. A joint
case management statement is due no later than March 29, 2016.
EXHIBIT D TO FEDERAL PRO BONO PROJECT GUIDELINES
Counsels' contact information is: Pankit Doshi and John-Paul Deol, Four
Embarcadero Center, 17th Floor, San Francisco, CA 94111-4109. Counsel shall be familiar
with General Order No. 25 and the Federal Pro Bono Project Guidelines posted on the
Court’s website.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: March 4, 2016
VINCE CHHABRIA
United States District Judge
EXHIBIT D TO FEDERAL PRO BONO PROJECT GUIDELINES
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?