e.Digital Corporation v. MivaTek International, Inc.
Filing
23
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 20 STIPULATION and Proposed Order selecting Mediation by e.Digital Corporation and MivaTek International, Inc. filed by e.Digital Corporation. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on April 7, 2016. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/7/2016)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
e.Digital Corporation
,
Plaintiff(s),
v.
MivaTek International, Inc.
CASE NO. ______________________
3:15-cv-05795-JST
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS
,
Defendant(s).
_______________________________/
Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the
following stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5:
The parties agree to participate in the following ADR process:
Court Processes:
9
Non-binding Arbitration (ADR L.R. 4)
9
Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) (ADR L.R. 5)
9
Mediation (ADR L.R. 6)
(Note: Parties who believe that an early settlement conference with a Magistrate Judge is
appreciably more likely to meet their needs than any other form of ADR must participate in an
ADR phone conference and may not file this form. They must instead file a Notice of Need for
ADR Phone Conference. See Civil Local Rule 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5)
Private Process:
9
Private ADR (please identify process and provider) ______________________
_____________________________________________________________________________
The parties agree to hold the ADR session by:
9
the presumptive deadline (The deadline is 90 days from the date of the order
referring the case to an ADR process unless otherwise ordered. )
9
other requested deadline _____________________________________________
Dated:___________
4/6/16
____________________________
/s/ Gabriel G. Hedrick
Attorney for Plaintiff
Dated:____________
4/6/16
____________________________
/s/ Jason N. Haycock
Attorney for Defendant
CONTINUE TO FOLLOWING PAGE
[PROPOSED] ORDER
The parties’ stipulation is adopted and IT IS SO ORDERED.
The parties’ stipulation is modified as follows, and IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
April 7, 2016
VED
APPRO
R NIA
UNIT
ED
S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
RT
U
O
S
9
9
__________________________________
A
H
ER
LI
RT
FO
NO
i ga r
on S. T
JDISTRICT
ge MAGISTRATE JUDGE
UNITED STATES
Jud
N
F
D IS T IC T O
R
C
When filing this document in ECF, please be sure to use the appropriate Docket
Event, e.g., “Stipulation and Proposed Order Selecting Mediation.”
Rev. 12/11
Page 2 of 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?