Walker v. Krol et al

Filing 20

ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. DENYING AS MOOT PLAINTIFF'S 19 REQUEST FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME TO COMPLY WITH COURT ORDERS; SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service)(ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/17/2016)

1
2
3
4

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

5

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

6
7

JEFFREY E. WALKER,

Case No. 15-cv-05819-HSG

Plaintiff,
8
v.
9
10

KROL, et al.,
Defendants.

Re: Dkt. No. 19

11
United States District Court
Northern District of California

ORDER DENYING AS MOOT
PLAINTIFF'S REQUEST FOR AN
EXTENSION OF TIME TO COMPLY
WITH COURT ORDERS; SETTING
BRIEFING SCHEDULE

12
13

Plaintiff filed this pro se civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, alleging that prison

14

officials at San Francisco County Jail violated his constitutional rights. On August 16, 2016,

15

Defendants informed the Court that they had been unable to reach Plaintiff because he had been

16

released from the custody of the San Francisco Sheriff’s Department on May 10, 2016, but had not

17

provided the Court or Defendants with notice of his new address. Docket No. 15. Defendants

18

requested an extension of time to file their dispositive motion, stating that they need to depose

19

Plaintiff in order to file a dispositive motion but had been unable to contact Plaintiff. Id.

20

On August 18, 2016, the Court ordered Plaintiff to comply with Civil Local Rule 3-11 and

21

notify the Court and all parties of his new address. Docket No. 16. The Court stayed all deadlines

22

pending Plaintiff’s compliance with Rule 3-11. Id. On October 4, 2016, Plaintiff informed the

23

Court of his new address via phone. On October 12, 2016, Plaintiff filed a notice of change of

24

address with the Court and requested an extension of time to comply with court orders. Docket

25

No. 19. Plaintiff’s request for an extension of time is DENIED AS MOOT. There are no Court

26

orders requiring Plaintiff’s response.

27

The Court sets the following briefing schedule. By December 19, 2016, Defendants must

28

file and serve a motion for summary judgment or other dispositive motion. Plaintiff’s opposition

1

to the summary judgment or other dispositive motion must be filed with the Court and served

2

upon defendants no later than 28 days from the date the motion is filed. Defendants shall file a

3

reply brief no later than 14 days after the date the opposition is filed.

4

This order terminates Docket No. 19.

5

IT IS SO ORDERED.

6
7
8

Dated: 10/17/2016
______________________________________
HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR.
United States District Judge

9
10

United States District Court
Northern District of California

11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21

22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2