San Francisco Baykeeper v. Taylor
Filing
11
ORDER re 10 Notice (Other) filed by San Francisco Baykeeper. Signed by Magistrate Judge Maria-Elena James on 4/26/2016. (rmm2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/26/2016)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
George Torgun (Bar No. 222085)
Nicole C. Sasaki (Bar No. 298736)
SAN FRANCISCO BAYKEEPER
1736 Franklin Street, Suite 800
Oakland, California 94612
Telephone: (510) 735-9700
Facsimile: (510) 735-9160
Email: george@baykeeper.org
Email: nicole@baykeeper.org
Attorneys for Plaintiff
SAN FRANCISCO BAYKEEPER
8
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11
OAKLAND DIVISION
12
13
14
SAN FRANCISCO BAYKEEPER, a non-profit
corporation,
15
Plaintiff,
16
17
18
v.
JAMES F. TAYLOR dba PINOLE RODEO
AUTO WRECKERS,
19
20
Defendant.
Civil No. 4:15-cv-05825-MEJ
SECOND REQUEST TO CONTINUE CASE
MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND
ASSOCIATED DEADLINES, AND TO
EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO
COMPLAINT; [PROPOSED] ORDER
(Federal Water Pollution Control Act, 33
U.S.C. § 1251 et seq.)
Honorable Maria-Elena James
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
SECOND REQUEST TO CONTINUE CMC & TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT -Civil No. 4:15-cv-05825-MEJ
WHEREAS, on December 18, 2015, Plaintiff San Francisco Baykeeper (“Plaintiff”) filed the
1
2
above-entitled action;
WHEREAS, Defendant has chosen to proceed as a pro se litigant, and has not appeared in this
3
4
5
6
7
action;
WHEREAS, Plaintiff and Defendant (collectively, the “Parties”) have been working together
in good faith to reach a settlement agreement in this action;
WHEREAS, pursuant to a request by Plaintiff (Dkt. 5), the Court set the initial Case
8
Management Conference in this action for May 5, 2016 at 10:00 a.m., and continued other deadlines in
9
the case (Dkt. 6);
10
11
12
WHEREAS, the Parties desire to continue informal negotiations in good faith, and anticipate
reaching a final settlement in this action within the next ten (10) weeks;
WHEREAS, Plaintiff requests, upon the Court’s approval, to reschedule the Case Management
13
Conference for July 7, 2016, at 10:00 a.m., or at such later date that is convenient for the Court, in
14
order to give the Parties a chance to complete settlement negotiations without involving the resources
15
of the Court;
16
WHEREAS, Plaintiff requests, upon the Court’s approval, to reschedule the deadline to file the
17
Parties’ ADR certifications and stipulations to ADR process or notices of need for an ADR phone
18
conference no later than one week before the Case Management Conference;
19
WHEREAS, Plaintiff requests, upon the Court’s approval, to reschedule the deadline to file the
20
Parties’ Rule 26(f) Report and Joint Case Management Statement no later than one week before the
21
Case Management Conference;
22
WHEREAS, Plaintiff requests, upon the Court’s approval, to reschedule the deadline to file the
23
Parties’ initial disclosures or objections in their Rule 26(f) Report no later than one week before the
24
Case Management Conference;
25
26
WHEREAS, pursuant to a request filed by Plaintiff (Dkt. 8), the Court extended Defendant’s
time to respond to the complaint to until May 23, 2016 (Dkt. 9);
27
28
SECOND REQUEST TO CONTINUE CMC & TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT -Civil No. 4:15-cv-05825-MEJ
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
WHEREAS, the Parties desire to extend the time for Defendant to respond to the complaint
until July 11, 2016;
WHEREAS, such an extension of time within which to answer or otherwise respond to the
complaint will not alter the date of any event or any deadline already fixed by Court Order;
WHEREAS, Plaintiff requests, upon the Court’s approval, to extend the time for Defendant to
respond to the complaint to July 11, 2016, in order to give the Parties a chance to complete settlement
negotiations;
WHEREFORE, Plaintiff respectfully requests the Court to approve and enter the Proposed
Order below.
DATE: April 25, 2016
Respectfully Submitted,
11
/s/ Nicole C. Sasaki
12
Nicole C. Sasaki
Attorneys for Plaintiff
SAN FRANCISCO BAYKEEPER
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
SECOND REQUEST TO CONTINUE CMC & TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT -Civil No. 4:15-cv-05825-MEJ
[PROPOSED] ORDER
1
2
3
4
5
GOOD CAUSE APPEARING,
July 7, 2016
1. The Case Management Conference shall be continued to ________________________
at 10:00 a.m.
2. The Parties’ ADR certifications and stipulations to ADR process or notices of need for
6
an ADR phone conference shall be filed no later than one week before the Case
7
Management Conference.
8
9
10
11
12
13
3. The Parties’ Rule 26(f) Report and Joint Case Management Statement shall be filed no
later than one week before the Case Management Conference.
4. The Parties’ initial disclosures or objections in their Rule 26(f) Report shall be filed no
later than one week before the Case Management Conference.
5. Defendant’s time to respond to the complaint shall be extended to July 11, 2016.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
14
15
April 26, 2016
Date: ____________________
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
16
17
_____________________________________
Honorable Maria-Elena James
United States District Court
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
SECOND REQUEST TO CONTINUE CMC & TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT -Civil No. 4:15-cv-05825-MEJ
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?