San Francisco Baykeeper v. Taylor
Filing
21
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 20 Notice (Other) filed by San Francisco Baykeeper. Signed by Magistrate Judge Maria-Elena James on 9/20/2016. (rmm2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/20/2016)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Erica A. Maharg (Bar No. 279396)
Nicole C. Sasaki (Bar No. 298736)
SAN FRANCISCO BAYKEEPER
1736 Franklin Street, Suite 800
Oakland, California 94612
Telephone: (510) 735-9700
Facsimile: (510) 735-9160
Email: erica@baykeeper.org
Email: nicole@baykeeper.org
Attorneys for Plaintiff
SAN FRANCISCO BAYKEEPER
8
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11
OAKLAND DIVISION
12
13
14
SAN FRANCISCO BAYKEEPER, a non-profit
corporation,
15
Plaintiff,
16
17
18
v.
JAMES F. TAYLOR dba PINOLE RODEO
AUTO WRECKERS,
19
20
Defendant.
Civil No. 3:15-cv-05825-MEJ
NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT AND
REQUEST TO VACATE TIME TO
RESPOND TO COMPLAINT AND CASE
MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE;
[PROPOSED] ORDER
(Federal Water Pollution Control Act, 33
U.S.C. § 1251 et seq.)
Honorable Maria-Elena James
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Notice of Settlement & Request to Vacate Time to Respond to Complaint & CMC
Civil No. 3:15-cv-05825-MEJ
1
TO THE COURT AND TO THE PARTIES:
2
PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that Plaintiff San Francisco Baykeeper and Defendant James F.
3
Taylor dba Pinole Rodeo Auto Wreckers (collectively, the “Parties”) have reached a tentative
4
settlement in this action, which has been executed by the Parties. As required by federal law, a copy
5
of the [Proposed] Settlement Agreement has been sent to the U.S. Department of Justice and to the
6
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (collectively, the “Agencies”) for a mandatory 45-day review
7
period under 33 U.S.C. § 1365(c)(3) and 40 C.F.R. § 135.5. Copies of the [Proposed] Settlement
8
Agreement will be sent to the Agencies via U.S. Certified Mail on today’s date. Upon expiration of
9
the 45-day review period, Plaintiff will request that the Court (1) approve and execute the [Proposed]
10
Settlement Agreement which provides for continuing Court jurisdiction over any disputes which may
11
arise between the Parties under the agreement, and (2) approve and execute an Order dismissing the
12
Complaint.
13
Therefore, in light of the 45-day statutory review period, which ends on approximately
14
November 3, 2016, Plaintiff requests that the Court vacate from its calendar Defendant’s deadline to
15
respond to the complaint on September 26, 2016, and the December 1, 2016 Case Management
16
Conference and associated deadlines, and issue an order that Plaintiff has until November 15, 2016 to
17
file a request to enter the [Proposed] Settlement Agreement.
18
19
20
WHEREFORE, Plaintiff respectfully requests that the Court approve and enter the Proposed
Order below.
DATE: September 19, 2016
21
Respectfully Submitted,
/s/ Nicole C. Sasaki
22
Nicole C. Sasaki
Attorneys for Plaintiff
SAN FRANCISCO BAYKEEPER
23
24
25
26
27
28
Notice of Settlement & Request to Vacate Time to Respond to Complaint & CMC
Civil No. 3:15-cv-05825-MEJ
[PROPOSED] ORDER
1
2
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant’s deadline to respond to the complaint on
3
September 26, 2016 and the Case Management Conference set for December 1, 2016 and all
4
associated deadlines are vacated. The Court sets November 15, 2016 as the deadline for Plaintiff to
5
file a request to enter the [Proposed] Settlement Agreement.
6
7
IT IS SO ORDERED.
8
9
September 20, 2016
Date: ____________________
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
_____________________________________
Honorable Maria-Elena James
United States District Court
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Notice of Settlement & Request to Vacate Time to Respond to Complaint & CMC
Civil No. 3:15-cv-05825-MEJ
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?