San Francisco Baykeeper v. Taylor

Filing 21

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 20 Notice (Other) filed by San Francisco Baykeeper. Signed by Magistrate Judge Maria-Elena James on 9/20/2016. (rmm2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/20/2016)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Erica A. Maharg (Bar No. 279396) Nicole C. Sasaki (Bar No. 298736) SAN FRANCISCO BAYKEEPER 1736 Franklin Street, Suite 800 Oakland, California 94612 Telephone: (510) 735-9700 Facsimile: (510) 735-9160 Email: erica@baykeeper.org Email: nicole@baykeeper.org Attorneys for Plaintiff SAN FRANCISCO BAYKEEPER 8 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 OAKLAND DIVISION 12 13 14 SAN FRANCISCO BAYKEEPER, a non-profit corporation, 15 Plaintiff, 16 17 18 v. JAMES F. TAYLOR dba PINOLE RODEO AUTO WRECKERS, 19 20 Defendant. Civil No. 3:15-cv-05825-MEJ NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT AND REQUEST TO VACATE TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT AND CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE; [PROPOSED] ORDER (Federal Water Pollution Control Act, 33 U.S.C. § 1251 et seq.) Honorable Maria-Elena James 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Notice of Settlement & Request to Vacate Time to Respond to Complaint & CMC Civil No. 3:15-cv-05825-MEJ 1 TO THE COURT AND TO THE PARTIES: 2 PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that Plaintiff San Francisco Baykeeper and Defendant James F. 3 Taylor dba Pinole Rodeo Auto Wreckers (collectively, the “Parties”) have reached a tentative 4 settlement in this action, which has been executed by the Parties. As required by federal law, a copy 5 of the [Proposed] Settlement Agreement has been sent to the U.S. Department of Justice and to the 6 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (collectively, the “Agencies”) for a mandatory 45-day review 7 period under 33 U.S.C. § 1365(c)(3) and 40 C.F.R. § 135.5. Copies of the [Proposed] Settlement 8 Agreement will be sent to the Agencies via U.S. Certified Mail on today’s date. Upon expiration of 9 the 45-day review period, Plaintiff will request that the Court (1) approve and execute the [Proposed] 10 Settlement Agreement which provides for continuing Court jurisdiction over any disputes which may 11 arise between the Parties under the agreement, and (2) approve and execute an Order dismissing the 12 Complaint. 13 Therefore, in light of the 45-day statutory review period, which ends on approximately 14 November 3, 2016, Plaintiff requests that the Court vacate from its calendar Defendant’s deadline to 15 respond to the complaint on September 26, 2016, and the December 1, 2016 Case Management 16 Conference and associated deadlines, and issue an order that Plaintiff has until November 15, 2016 to 17 file a request to enter the [Proposed] Settlement Agreement. 18 19 20 WHEREFORE, Plaintiff respectfully requests that the Court approve and enter the Proposed Order below. DATE: September 19, 2016 21 Respectfully Submitted, /s/ Nicole C. Sasaki 22 Nicole C. Sasaki Attorneys for Plaintiff SAN FRANCISCO BAYKEEPER 23 24 25 26 27 28 Notice of Settlement & Request to Vacate Time to Respond to Complaint & CMC Civil No. 3:15-cv-05825-MEJ [PROPOSED] ORDER 1 2 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant’s deadline to respond to the complaint on 3 September 26, 2016 and the Case Management Conference set for December 1, 2016 and all 4 associated deadlines are vacated. The Court sets November 15, 2016 as the deadline for Plaintiff to 5 file a request to enter the [Proposed] Settlement Agreement. 6 7 IT IS SO ORDERED. 8 9 September 20, 2016 Date: ____________________ NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 _____________________________________ Honorable Maria-Elena James United States District Court 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Notice of Settlement & Request to Vacate Time to Respond to Complaint & CMC Civil No. 3:15-cv-05825-MEJ

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?