Polley v. Davis
Filing
10
ORDER DISMISSING CASE. Signed by Judge James Donato on 3/17/16. (lrcS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/17/2016)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7
STEPHEN L. POLLEY,
Petitioner,
8
9
10
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
Case No. 15-cv-05871-JD
ORDER OF DISMISSAL
v.
R. DAVIS,
Respondent.
12
13
Petitioner, a state prisoner, filed a pro se petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28
14
U.S.C. ยง 2254. In the initial review order, the Court dismissed the petition with leave to amend.
15
Although the time to amend has expired, petitioner has not amended or otherwise communicated
16
with the Court. This case is DISMISSED without prejudice. A Certificate of Appealability is
17
DENIED. See Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000).
18
19
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: March 17, 2016
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
JAMES DONATO
United States District Judge
1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
2
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
3
4
STEPHEN L. POLLEY,
Case No. 15-cv-05871-JD
Plaintiff,
5
v.
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
6
7
R. DAVIS,
Defendant.
8
9
10
I, the undersigned, hereby certify that I am an employee in the Office of the Clerk, U.S.
District Court, Northern District of California.
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
13
14
15
That on March 17, 2016, I SERVED a true and correct copy(ies) of the attached, by
placing said copy(ies) in a postage paid envelope addressed to the person(s) hereinafter listed, by
depositing said envelope in the U.S. Mail, or by placing said copy(ies) into an inter-office delivery
receptacle located in the Clerk's office.
16
17
18
Stephen L. Polley ID: C-57727
San Quentin
PO Box 1-W-20-L
San Quentin, CA 94974
19
20
21
Dated: March 17, 2016
22
23
Susan Y. Soong
Clerk, United States District Court
24
25
26
27
By:________________________
LISA R. CLARK, Deputy Clerk to the
Honorable JAMES DONATO
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?