Haley et al v. Macy's, Inc. et al

Filing 28

ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting (27) in case 3:15-cv-06033-HSG; (12) in case 3:16-cv-01252-HSG; (10) in case 3:16-cv-02850-HSG Stipulation Re Schedule For Case Management Conference and Defendants' Response Deadline. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/1/2016)

1
2
3
4
5
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

6
7
8
9
10
11
12

KRISTIN HALEY and SYLVIA
THOMPSON, individually and on behalf of all ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION RE
others similarly situated,
SCHEDULE FOR CASE MANAGEMENT
CONFERENCE AND DEFENDANTS’
Plaintiffs,
RESPONSE DEADLINE
vs.

Case No. 3:15-cv-06033-HSG

MACY’S, INC. and
BLOOMINGDALE’S, INC.,

Judge: Hon. Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr.

Defendants.

13
14
15

TODD BENSON, on behalf of himself and all
others similarly situated,

The Honorable Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr.

16
17
18
19

Case No. 3:16-cv-01252-HSG

Plaintiff,
vs.
MACY’S, INC., MACY’S WEST STORIES,
INC., and BLOOMINGDALE’S, INC.,
Defendants.

20
21
22

ZOHREH FARHANG, individually and on
behalf of all others similarly situated,

The Honorable Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr.

23
24
25
26

Case No. 3:16-cv-02850-HSG

Plaintiffs,
vs.
MACY’S, INC., MACY’S WEST STORES,
INC. and BLOOMINGDALE’S, INC.,
Defendants.

27
28
83459827v2

1.

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION RE SCHEDULE FOR CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND
DEFENDANTS’ RESPONSE DEADLINE

1
2
3
4

ORDER
PURSUANT TO THE STIPULATION OF THE PARTIES, IT IS SO ORDERED. Good
cause shown,
(1)

Defendants need not respond to the original Complaints in Haley, Benson, or

5

Farhang until after Plaintiffs’ Motion to Consolidate is decided; if Plaintiffs are granted leave to

6

file a Consolidated Complaint, Defendants’ deadline to respond to that Consolidated Complaint

7

shall be 30 days after the Consolidated Complaint is filed; if, alternatively, Plaintiffs’ Motion to

8

Consolidate is denied, Defendants shall respond to the original Complaints within 30 days of the

9

Court’s order denying Plaintiffs’ motion.

10

(2)

The Case Management Conference currently scheduled for August 30, 2016 in

11

Benson and Farhang shall be continued until after Defendants file their responsive pleadings

12

(whether to the original Complaints or a Consolidated Complaint), and, if Defendants respond with

13

a motion to dismiss, until after that motion is fully briefed and decided.

14
15

DATED: July 1, 2016

16

___________________________________
HONORABLE HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR.
United States District Court Judge

17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
83459827v2

2.

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION RE SCHEDULE FOR CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND
DEFENDANTS’ RESPONSE DEADLINE