Haley et al v. Macy's, Inc. et al

Filing 40

ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 39 Stipulation Re Docket No. 36 . (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/3/2016)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 KRISTIN HALEY, SYLVIA 12 THOMPSON, TODD BENSON, ZOHREH FARHANG, JOB CARDER, AND ERICA 13 VINCI individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, 14 Plaintiffs, 15 vs. 16 MACY’S, INC., et al., 17 Defendants. 18 CASE NO. 3:15-cv-06033-HSG [Consolidated with Case Nos. 16-cv-01252HSG,16-cv-02850-HSG, and 16-cv-03341-SBA] [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION TO SET BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR CONSOLIDATED COMPLAINT AND TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE Judge: Hon. Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -1Case No. 3:15-cv-06033-HSG [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION TO SET BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR CONSOLIDATED COMPLAINT AND TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE 1 [PROPOSED] ORDER 2 PURSUANT TO THE STIPULATION OF THE PARTIES, IT IS SO ORDERED. 3 Good cause shown, Defendants shall respond to the Consolidated Complaint by November 4 17, 2016. If Defendants respond with a Motion to Dismiss, Plaintiffs’ Opposition to that Motion 5 shall be due on December 8, 2016, Defendants’ Reply shall be due on December 29, 2016, and the 6 Motion shall be heard on January 19, 2017 at 2:00 p.m. The Case Management Conference currently February 2, 2017 at 2:00 p.m. 7 scheduled for November 8, 2016 is continued until after this Court decides Defendants’ Motion to 8 Dismiss. 9 10 11 DATED: _______________, 2016 November 3 12 ______________________________________ HONORABLE HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR. United States District Court Judge 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -2Case No. 3:15-cv-06033-HSG [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION TO SET BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR CONSOLIDATED COMPLAINT AND TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE 83915409v1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?