Haley et al v. Macy's, Inc. et al

Filing 46

ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 45 STIPULATION TO MODIFY BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON DEFENDANTS MOTION TO DISMISS CONSOLIDATED COMPLAINT. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/9/2016)

ROSEMARY M. RIVAS (Bar No. 209147)

1 [e-mail]

FINKELSTEIN THOMPSON LLP

2 1 California Street, Suite 900

San Francisco, California 94111

3 Telephone: [phone]
4
5

Facsimile: [phone]
Counsel for Plaintiffs

6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10 KRISTIN HALEY, et al.,
Plaintiff,

11
12

v.

13 MACY’S INC., et al.,
14

Defendant.

15

Case No. 3:15-cv-06033-HSG
(Consolidated with:
3:16-cv-01252-HSG,
3:16-cv-02850-HSG, and
3:16-cv-03341-HSG)
STIPULATION & ORDER TO MODIFY
BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON
DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS
CONSOLIDATED COMPLAINT

16
17
18
19

WHEREAS, Defendants filed a motion to dismiss Plaintiffs’ Consolidated Complaint on

20 November 17, 2016 and set a hearing for February 2, 2017;
21

WHEREAS, under the current briefing schedule, Plaintiffs’ opposition brief is due on

22 December 8, 2016 and Defendants’ reply is due on December 29, 2016;
23

WHEREAS, Plaintiffs seek to meet and confer with Defendants about some of the issues

24 raised in the motion to dismiss to determine whether any can be resolved informally;
25

ACCORDINGLY, THE PARTIES HEREBY STIPULATE AND AGREE as follows:

26

Plaintiffs’ opposition to the motion to dismiss shall be filed on or before December 12,

27 2016 and Defendants’ reply brief shall be filed on or before January 5, 2017. The hearing on the
28 motion to dismiss will remain the same.
Case No. 3:15-cv-06033-HSG

STIPULATION & [PROPOSED] ORDER

1
2 DATED: December 8, 2016

FINKELSTEIN THOMPSON LLP

3
4

By: /s/ Rosemary M. Rivas
Rosemary M. Rivas

5

Counsel for Plaintiffs

6 DATED: December 8, 2016

SEDGWICK LLP

7

By: /s/ Stephanie Sheridan
Stephanie Sheridan

8

Counsel for Defendants

9

ORDER

10
11
12
13
14
15

Based on the foregoing stipulation and good cause being shown, the Court hereby
GRANTS the parties’ Stipulation. The Court hereby orders as follows:
1.

Plaintiffs’ opposition to the motion to dismiss shall be filed on or before December

12, 2016 and Defendants’ reply brief shall be filed on or before January 5, 2017. The hearing on
the motion to dismiss shall remain the same.

16
17

IT IS SO ORDERED.

18 Date: December 9, 2016

___________________________
Hon. Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr.
United States District Court Judge

19
20
21

FILER’S ATTESTATION

22
23

Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 5-1 regarding signatures, I attest under penalty of perjury that

24 the concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from all signatories.
/s/ Rosemary M. Rivas
Rosemary M. Rivas

25
26
27
28
Case No. 3:15-cv-06033-HSG

-2-

STIPULATION & [PROPOSED] ORDER