General Employees Trust Fund and Board of Trustees of General Employees Trust Fund v. Delta Window Cleaning Co., Inc.

Filing 19

ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 15 Stipulation Selecting Mediation.(ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/10/2016)

1
2
3
4
5
6

WYLIE, McBRIDE, PLATTEN & RENNER
DIANE SIDD-CHAMPION, SBN 78140
605 Market Street, Suite 1200
San Francisco, California 94105
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
E-mail:
[e-mail]
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
General Employees Trust Fund and
Board of Trustees of General Employees Trust Fund

7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

11
12

GENERAL EMPLOYEES TRUST FUND and
BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF GENERAL
EMPLOYEES TRUST FUND,

Case No. 15-cv-06141-HSG
STIPULATION AND ORDER
(PROPOSED) ORDER SELECTING ADR
PROCESS

13

Plaintiffs,
14

vs.
[ADR L.R. 3-5]

15
16
17

DELTA WINDOW CLEANING COMPANY
INCORPORATED,
Defendant.

18

The parties stipulate to participate in the following ADR process:
19

Court Processes:
20
21

❏ Arbitration
❏ ENE
x Mediation
(Use space below to provide any information regarding timing of session, preferred subject matter
expertise of neutral, or other issues.)

22
23
24

Private Process:
❑ Private ADR (please identify process and provider)

25

WYLIE, McBRIDE, PLATTEN & RENNER
26
27
28

Dated: March 8, 2016

By:

/s/ Diane Sidd-Champion
DIANE SIDD-CHAMPION
Attorneys for Plaintiffs

STIPULATION AND (PROPOSED) ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS
Case No. 15-cv-06141-HSG

1
2

SILICON VALLEY LAW GROUP
Dated: March 8, 2016

3

By:
/s/ Edward A. Kraus
EDWARD A. KRAUS
Attorneys for Defendant

4
5
6

IT IS SO ORDERED. The parties shall hold the mediation by the presumptive 90-day deadline.

7
8
9

Dated: ______________________
3/10/2016

By: ________________________________
HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

STIPULATION AND (PROPOSED) ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS
Case No. 15-cv-06141-HSG

2

ECF ATTESTATION

1
2
3

I, Diane Sidd-Champion, hereby attest that concurrence in the filing of this document has
been obtained from the other signatory to this document.

4

I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that the

5

foregoing is true and correct. Executed this 8th day of March 2016 at San Francisco, California.

6
7
8

By:
/s/ Diane Sidd-Champion_______
DIANE SIDD-CHAMPION
Attorney for Plaintiffs

9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
l:\0198\40094\stipulation to adr process.docx

28

STIPULATION AND (PROPOSED) ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS
Case No. 15-cv-06141-HSG

3