Northern California Minimally Invasive Cardiovascular Surgery et al v. NorthBay Healthcare Corporation et al
Filing
73
ORDER DENYING PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION OF ATTORNEY MATTHEW RILEY by Hon. William Alsup denying 72 Motion for Pro Hac Vice.(whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/29/2016)
1
2
3
4
5
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
6
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
7
8
9
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
NORTHERN CALIFORNIA
MINIMALLY INVASIVE
CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, INC.,
et al.,
Plaintiffs,
12
13
14
15
No. C 15-06283 WHA
ORDER DENYING PRO
HAC VICE APPLICATION
OF ATTORNEY MATTHEW
RILEY
v.
NORTHBAY HEALTH CARE, et al.,
Defendants.
/
16
17
The pro hac vice application of Attorney Matthew Riley (Dkt. No. 72) is DENIED for
18
failing to comply with Local Rule 11-3. The local rule requires that an applicant certify that “he
19
or she is an active member in good standing of the bar of a United States Court or of the highest
20
court of another State or the District of Columbia, specifying such bar” (emphasis added).
21
Filling out the pro hac vice form from the district court website such that it only identifies the
22
state of bar membership — such as “the bar of Illinois” — is inadequate under the local rule
23
because it fails to identify a specific court. While the application fee does not need to be paid
24
again, the application cannot be processed until a corrected form is submitted.
25
26
IT IS SO ORDERED.
27
28
Dated: November 29, 2016.
WILLIAM ALSUP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?