Edwards v. Menzies Aviation (USA), Inc.

Filing 10

STIPULATION AND ORDER Regarding Arbitration and to Stay Action as Modified by the Court. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 1/7/16. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/7/2016)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 CHRISTOPHER G. WARD, CA Bar No. 238777 cward@foley.com ARCHANA R. ACHARYA, CA Bar No. 272989 aacharya@foley.com FOLEY & LARDNER LLP 555 SOUTH FLOWER STREET, SUITE 3500 LOS ANGELES, CA 90071-2411 TELEPHONE: 213.972.4500 FACSIMILE: 213.486.0065 KRISTA M. CABRERA, CA Bar No. 190595 kcabrera@foley.com FOLEY & LARDNER LLP 3579 VALLEY CENTRE DRIVE, SUITE 300 SAN DIEGO, CA 92130 TELEPHONE: 858.847.6700 FACSIMILE: 858.792.6773 Attorneys for Defendant MENZIES AVIATION (USA), INC. FLETCHER B. BROWN, (State Bar No. 276390) fletchbrown@gmail.com FLETCHER B. BROWN LAW FIRM 2831 TELEGRAPH AVE. OAKLAND, CA 94609 TELEPHONE: 510.299.1333 Attorneys for Plaintiff RODERICK EDWARDS 17 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 18 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 19 20 RODERICK EDWARDS, 21 Plaintiff, 22 vs. 23 24 MENZIES AVIATION, (USA) INC., DOES 1 THROUGH 100, inclusive, 25 26 Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 15-cv-06311-RS STIPULATION AND ORDER REGARDING ARBITRATION AND TO STAY ACTION AS MODIFIED BY THE COURT Judge: Courtroom: Hon. Richard Seeborg 3 – 17th Floor 27 28 -1Error! Unknown document property name. STIPULATION AND ORDER Case No. 15-cv-06311-RS 1 This Stipulation Regarding Arbitration and to Stay Action (“Stipulation”) is entered between 2 Roderick Edwards (“Plaintiff”), on the one hand, and Menzies Aviation (USA), Inc. (“Menzies”) on the 3 other as follows: 4 RECITALS 5 WHEREAS, on November 25, 2015, Plaintiff filed a Complaint against Menzies alleging 6 various claims related to his employment with Menzies (the “Complaint”); 7 WHEREAS, on December 30, 2015, Menzies filed a Notice of Removal to this Court; 8 WHEREAS, on June 14, 2012, the Parties entered into an Agreement to be Bound by 9 10 11 Alternative Dispute Policy (the “Agreement”); WHEREAS, the Parties desire to resolve this matter through final and binding arbitration in accordance with the terms of the Agreement. 12 STIPULATION 13 In light of the foregoing, the Parties stipulate as follows: 14 1. 15 16 17 The Complaint and all Causes of Action and Prayers for Relief contained therein shall be and hereby are, referred to mandatory, binding arbitration; 2. The Complaint and all Causes of Action and Prayers for Relief contained therein shall be and are hereby stayed pending the conclusion of binding arbitration; 18 19 DATED: January 5, 2016 20 FOLEY & LARDNER LLP Christopher G. Ward Krista M. Cabrera Archana R. Acharya 21 22 /s/ Krista M. Cabrera Krista M. Cabrera Attorneys for Defendant MENZIES AVIATION (USA), INC. 23 24 25 DATED: January 4, 2016 FLETCHER B. BROWN LAW FIRM Fletcher B. Brown 26 27 28 /s/ Fletcher B. Brown Fletcher B. Brown Attorneys for Plaintiff RODERICK EDWARDS -2- STIPULATION AND ORDER Case No.15-cv-06311-RS 1 2 3 DECLARATION OF CONSENT The undersigned filer attests, pursuant to Civil Local Rile 5-1(i)(3), that the concurrence in the filing of the document has been obtained from the other signatories to this document. 4 5 Dated: January 5, 2016 By: 6 /s/ Krista M. Cabrera Krista M. Cabrera 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -3- STIPULATION AND ORDER Case No.15-cv-06311-RS 1 2 ORDER Pursuant to the Stipulation of the Parties, good cause appearing therefor, this action is hereby 3 stayed as set forth above. The matter shall be administratively closed. Any party may move to reopen 4 the case in the event further proceedings become necessary. 5 6 IT IS SO ORDERED. 7 8 9 DATE: 1/7/2016 BY: ________________________________________ Hon. Richard Seeborg United States District Judge 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -4- STIPULATION AND ORDER Case No.15-cv-06311-RS

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?