Cook v. Kernan et al

Filing 19

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART 18 RESPONDENT'S MOTION FOR ENLARGEMENT OF TIME RE 16 MOTION TO DISMISS.(whalc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/15/2016)

1
2
3
4
5
6

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
WALTER JOSEPH COOK,III,
No. C 15-06343 WHA
Plaintiff,

11
For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10

12
13
14

v.
ORDER GRANTING IN PART
AND DENYING IN PART
RESPONDENT’S MOTION FOR
ENLARGEMENT OF TIME

SCOTT KERNAN,
Defendant.
/

15
16

Respondent asks for a 30-day extension to file its reply in support of its motion to

17

dismiss. Respondent submits a declaration by counsel asserting the extension is needed to

18

obtain files related to petitioner’s habeas petition in state court, which will take up to three

19

weeks from June 10, 2016. Respondent should be in possession of the files by July 1, 2016. An

20

extension is appropriate but not for the length of time requested. Respondent shall file its reply

21

brief on JULY 5, 2016. The hearing shall take place as scheduled on July 14, 2016.

22
23

IT IS SO ORDERED.

24
25
26
27
28

Dated: June 15, 2016.

WILLIAM ALSUP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE