Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation As Receiver For United Western Bank v. Berling et al
Filing
6
ORDER RE: DEFENDANTS MOTION TO COMPEL. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley on 6/4/2015. (ahm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/4/2015)
1
2
3
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
4
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
5
6
7
FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE
CORPORATION AS RECEIVER FOR
UNITED WESTERN BANK,
Plaintiff,
8
v.
ORDER RE: DEFENDANTS’ MOTION
TO COMPEL
Re: Dkt. No. 1
9
10
Case No. 15-mc-80150-JSC
CHARLES J. BERLING, et al.,
Defendants.
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
Defendants, Charles J. Berling, et al, have filed a motion to compel compliance with Rule
13
45 deposition subpoenas issued in this District to non-parties Steven J. Harris and Kevin B.
14
Swanson. (Dkt. No. 1.) The underlying civil action, FDIC v. Berling, et al., No. 14-137 CMA-
15
MJW, is pending in the United States District Court for the District of Colorado. As the motion
16
was filed as a fully-noticed motion, it shall proceed on that basis rather than as a joint letter brief
17
as ordinarily required under the Court’s Standing Order. The non-parties’ response to the motion
18
to compel shall be filed by June 19, 2015, and Defendants may file a reply on or before June 26,
19
2015. The matter shall be heard on July 9, 2015 at 9:00 a.m. in Courtroom F, 450 Golden Gate
20
Ave., San Francisco, California.
21
A review of the docket does not reflect service of the motion on the FDIC—the Plaintiff in
22
the underlying action. Accordingly, Defendants shall serve the motion and a copy of this Order on
23
the FDIC, and file proof of service of the same within three days. If the FDIC elects to file a
24
response to the motion to compel, it shall also do so by June 19, 2015.
25
26
27
28
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: June 4, 2015
________________________
JACQUELINE SCOTT CORLEY
United States Magistrate Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?