Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation As Receiver For United Western Bank v. Berling et al

Filing 6

ORDER RE: DEFENDANTS MOTION TO COMPEL. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley on 6/4/2015. (ahm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/4/2015)

Download PDF
1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 6 7 FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION AS RECEIVER FOR UNITED WESTERN BANK, Plaintiff, 8 v. ORDER RE: DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO COMPEL Re: Dkt. No. 1 9 10 Case No. 15-mc-80150-JSC CHARLES J. BERLING, et al., Defendants. United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 Defendants, Charles J. Berling, et al, have filed a motion to compel compliance with Rule 13 45 deposition subpoenas issued in this District to non-parties Steven J. Harris and Kevin B. 14 Swanson. (Dkt. No. 1.) The underlying civil action, FDIC v. Berling, et al., No. 14-137 CMA- 15 MJW, is pending in the United States District Court for the District of Colorado. As the motion 16 was filed as a fully-noticed motion, it shall proceed on that basis rather than as a joint letter brief 17 as ordinarily required under the Court’s Standing Order. The non-parties’ response to the motion 18 to compel shall be filed by June 19, 2015, and Defendants may file a reply on or before June 26, 19 2015. The matter shall be heard on July 9, 2015 at 9:00 a.m. in Courtroom F, 450 Golden Gate 20 Ave., San Francisco, California. 21 A review of the docket does not reflect service of the motion on the FDIC—the Plaintiff in 22 the underlying action. Accordingly, Defendants shall serve the motion and a copy of this Order on 23 the FDIC, and file proof of service of the same within three days. If the FDIC elects to file a 24 response to the motion to compel, it shall also do so by June 19, 2015. 25 26 27 28 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: June 4, 2015 ________________________ JACQUELINE SCOTT CORLEY United States Magistrate Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?