Ou-Young v. Obama et al

Filing 2

ORDER RE PRE-FILING REVIEW AND DISMISSING CASE. Signed by Judge Vince Chhabria on 6/29/2015. (knm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/29/2015)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 KUANG BAO P. OU YOUNG, Case No. 15-mc-80185-VC Plaintiff, 8 v. ORDER 9 10 OABAMA ET AL, Defendant. United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 The court has reviewed the complaint in the above-captioned matter and finds that it does 13 not state a potentially cognizable claim. Therefore, in accordance with the Order filed on 14 December 20, 2013 in Ou-Young v. Roberts, et al., Case No. 13-4442, the Clerk is directed not to 15 accept the complaint for filing and this action is dismissed. 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: June 29, 2015 ______________________________________ VINCE CHHABRIA United States District Judge 1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 KUANG-BAO P OU-YOUNG, Case No. 15-mc-80185-VC Plaintiff, 8 v. CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 9 10 BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA, et al., Defendants. United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 I, the undersigned, hereby certify that I am an employee in the Office of the Clerk, U.S. District Court, Northern District of California. That on June 29, 2015, I SERVED a true and correct copy(ies) of the attached, by placing said copy(ies) in a postage paid envelope addressed to the person(s) hereinafter listed, by depositing said envelope in the U.S. Mail, or by placing said copy(ies) into an inter-office delivery receptacle located in the Clerk's office. 18 19 20 Kuang-Bao P Ou-Young 1362 Wright Avenue Sunnyvale, CA 94087 21 22 Dated: June 29, 2015 23 24 Richard W. Wieking Clerk, United States District Court 25 26 27 28 By:________________________ Kristen Melen, Deputy Clerk to the Honorable VINCE CHHABRIA 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?