In re: Depuy Orthopaldics, Inc. Pinnacle Hip Implant Products Liability Litigation

Filing 11

ORDER RE: RESPONSE TO NOVEMBER 23, 2015 MDL ORDER. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley on 11/24/2015. (ahm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/24/2015)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 Case No. 3:15-mc-80259-JSC 7 8 9 IN RE: DEPUY ORTHOPAEDICS, INC. PINNACLE HIP IMPLANT PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION ORDER RE: RESPONSE TO NOVEMBER 23, 2015 MDL ORDER 10 THIS DOCUMENT United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 RELATES TO: ALL CASES 13 14 15 Now pending before the Court is the motion of non-parties Cardno Chemrisk, LLC and 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Dennis J. Paustenbach for a protective order. (Dkt. No. 1.) One issue is whether this Court should transfer the motion to the MDL court over the non-parties’ objection. On November 23, 2015, Plaintiffs filed a proposed order to the MDL court relevant to this question. (Dkt. No. 10.) Plaintiffs are directed to notify the Court in writing when the MDL court acts on the proposed order. If the non-parties wish to respond to this proposed order before the MDL court rules upon it, they shall do so on or before December 2, 2015. If they do not respond by that date, the Court will not take any action on the motion for a protective order until the MDL court rules. Once the MDL court makes its decision on the proposed order, the non-parties may file a response within three business days of the mdl court’s ruling if they have not already done so. // // // 1 IT IS SO ORDERED. 2 Dated: November 24, 2015 3 4 ______________________________________ JACQUELINE SCOTT CORLEY United States Magistrate Judge 5 6 7 8 9 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?