In re: Depuy Orthopaldics, Inc. Pinnacle Hip Implant Products Liability Litigation
Filing
13
ORDER VACATING HEARING. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley on 12/7/2015. (ahm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/7/2015)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7
8
9
Case No. 15-mc-80259-JSC
IN RE: DEPUY ORTHOPAEDICS, INC.
PINNACLE HIP IMPLANT PRODUCTS
LIABILITY LITIGATION
ORDER VACATING HEARING
10
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO:
ALL CASES
13
14
15
The hearing on the motion of non-parties Cardno Chemrisk, LLC and Dennis J.
16
Paustenbach for a protective order scheduled for December 10, 2015 is vacated pending the
17
MDL’s ruling on Plaintiffs’ proposed order. While the Court has considered the non-parties’
18
response filed November 30, 2015, the Court prefers to rule on the question of whether to transfer
19
the motion to the MDL court after the MDL court has ruled. While the MDL court’s signing of
20
the proposed order is not dispositive of the “extraordinary circumstances” question, in the Court’s
21
view the MDL court’s refusal to sign the proposed order would mandate that this Court decide the
22
pending motion. Accordingly, the December 10, 2015 hearing is VACATED and shall be
23
rescheduled upon the MDL court’s action on the proposed order.
24
Given that the discovery sought of the non-parties is stayed until this Court rules on the
25
pending motion, the non-parties are not prejudiced by this delay. Plaintiffs are likewise not
26
prejudiced given that they filed the proposed order and asked this Court to consider it. If at some
27
point Plaintiffs do not want any further delay, they may so notify the Court and the parties and the
28
Court will forthwith reschedule the pending motion for hearing. Plaintiffs are directed to notify the
1
2
3
Court within three business days of the MDL court ruling on the proposed order.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: December 7, 2015
4
________________________
JACQUELINE SCOTT CORLEY
United States Magistrate Judge
5
6
7
8
9
10
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?