Liberty et al v. State Bar of California
Filing
30
ORDER REMANDING CASE. Signed by Judge Thelton E. Henderson on 02/16/16. (tehlc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/16/2016)
1
2
3
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
4
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
5
6
LOUIS A. LIBERTY,
7
Plaintiff,
v.
8
9
Case No. 16-cv-00022-TEH
ORDER REMANDING CASE
STATE BAR OF CALIFORNIA,
Defendant.
10
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
After Louis Liberty removed this case, a disciplinary action against him in the State
13
Bar Court of California, this Court concluded that it lacked jurisdiction and issued an order
14
to show cause as to why the case should not be remanded. The parties filed timely
15
responses to the order to show cause. After reviewing the parties’ written arguments, the
16
Court finds oral argument to be unnecessary.
17
Liberty does not oppose remand of the disciplinary action against him.
18
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this case is remanded to the State Bar Court
19
of California without objection.
20
Liberty argues that this Court must retain jurisdiction over his counterclaim and
21
crossclaim because they are based in part on federal law. However, he cites no authority
22
for this proposition, and the Court declines to exercise jurisdiction over the counterclaim
23
and crossclaim/third-party complaint.1 See, e.g., Certain Underwriters at Lloyd’s London
24
v. Art Crating, Inc., Case No. No. 12-CV-5078 (NGG) (VMS), 2014 WL 123488, at *19
25
(E.D.N.Y. Jan. 10, 2014) (noting cases where courts found retention of federal
26
counterclaims to be discretionary and where courts “declined to exercise jurisdiction over
27
1
28
Liberty concedes that his crossclaim should have been filed as a third-party
complaint because it is not brought against co-parties.
1
and remanded third-party claims that could implicate original jurisdiction, once the main
2
action was remanded for lack of subject matter jurisdiction”).
3
4
IT IS SO ORDERED.
5
6
7
Dated: 02/16/16
_____________________________________
THELTON E. HENDERSON
United States District Judge
8
9
10
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?