Flanigan v. San Francisco Police Department et al
Filing
318
ORDER granting 309 Writ of Habeas Corpus Ad Testificandum to Transport Plaintiff Willie M. Flanigan. Signed by Judge William Alsup on 9/28/2023. (afm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/28/2023)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
Pamela R. Davis (SBN: 172870)
PDavis@winston.com
Rachel McCauley (SBN: 335833)
RMcCauley@winston.com
WINSTON & STRAWN LLP
101 California Street, 35th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94111
Telephone:
(415) 591-1000
Facsimile:
(415) 591-1400
Julie Bauer (admitted pro hac vice)
JBauer@winston.com
WINSTON & STRAWN LLP
35 W. Wacker Drive
Chicago, IL 60601-9703
Telephone: (312) 558-5600
Facsimile:
(312) 558-5700
Shawn Obi (SBN: 288088)
SObi@winston.com
Shui Sum Lau (SBN: 345456)
SsLau@winston.com
WINSTON & STRAWN LLP
333 S. Grand Ave, 38th Floor
Los Angeles, CA 90071
Telephone:
(213) 615-1700
Facsimile:
(213) 615-1750
Attorneys for Plaintiff
WILLIE M. FLANIGAN
17
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
18
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
19
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
20
WILLIE M. FLANIGAN,
21
22
23
24
25
Plaintiff,
vs.
SAN FRANCISCO POLICE DEPARTMENT,
et al.,
Defendants.
Case No. 3:16-cv-00066-WHA (PR)
[PROPOSED] ORDER AND WRIT OF
HABEAS CORPUS AD TESTIFICANDUM
TO TRANSPORT PLAINTIFF WILLIE M.
FLANIGAN
Judge:
Hon. William Alsup
Action Filed: January 6, 2016
Trial Date:
October 16, 2023
26
27
28
[PROPOSED] ORDER AND WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS AD TESTIFICANDUM TO TRANSPORT PLAINTIFF
CASE NO. 3:16-CV-00066-WHA
1
Willie Flanigan, California Department of Corrections number BL3458, the plaintiff and
2
necessary party in proceedings in this case on October 11, 2023 and October 16, 17, 18, 19, and 20,
3
2023, is confined to and in the custody of California State Prison San Quentin, Main Street, San
4
Quentin, CA 94964.
5
In order to secure Mr. Flanigan’s attendance, it is necessary that a Writ of Habeas Corpus Ad
6
Testificandum is issued commanding the custodian to produce Mr. Flanigan in Courtroom 12, 19th
7
Floor, United States District Court, 450 Golden Gate Avenue, CA 94102, October 11, 2023 at 12:00
8
p.m. and October 16, 17, 18, 19, and 20, 2023 at 7:30 a.m.
9
10
ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED THAT:
1.
A Writ of Habeas Corpus Ad Testificandum issue, under the seal of this court,
11
commanding the California Department of Corrections to produce Willie Flanigan, prison
12
identification number BL3458, to be present before the United States District Court at the time and
13
place above, and from day to day until completion of court proceedings or as ordered by the court,
14
and thereafter to return Mr. Flanigan to the above institution; and
15
16
2.
The custodian is ordered to notify the court of any change in custody of Mr. Flanigan
and is ordered to provide the new custodian with a copy of this writ.
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
Dated: September 19, 2023
Respectfully submitted,
WINSTON & STRAWN LLP
By: /s/ Rachel McCauley
Rachel McCauley
Attorneys for Plaintiff
WILLIE M. FLANIGAN
25
26
27
28
1
[PROPOSED] ORDER AND WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS AD TESTIFICANDUM TO TRANSPORT PLAINTIFF
CASE NO. 3:16-CV-00066-WHA
1
WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS AD TESTIFICADUM
2
To: The Warden of California State Prison San Quentin
3
WE COMMAND you to produce the person named above to testify before the United States
4
District Court at the time and place above, and from day to day until the completion of the
5
proceedings, or as ordered by the court; and thereafter return the person to the above institution.
6
7
FURTHER, you have been ordered to notify the court of any change in custody of the person
and have been ordered to provide the new custodian with a copy of this writ.
8
IT IS ORDERED.
9
Dated: September 28, 2023
10
11
By:
Honorable William H. Alsup
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
[PROPOSED] ORDER AND WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS AD TESTIFICANDUM TO TRANSPORT PLAINTIFF
CASE NO. 3:16-CV-00066-WHA (PR)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?