Marlowe v. City and County of San Francisco et al

Filing 31

ORDER VACATING HEARING ON DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on August 2, 2016. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/2/2016)

1
2
3
4

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

5

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

6
7

HEATHER MARLOWE,
Plaintiff,

8

CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN
FRANCISCO, et al.,

11
United States District Court
Northern District of California

ORDER VACATING HEARING ON
DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS

v.

9
10

Case No. 16-cv-00076-MMC

Defendants.

12
13
14
15

Before the Court is defendants' "Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint," filed July
14, 2016. Plaintiff has not filed opposition.1
Having read and considered the papers filed in support of the motion, the Court

16

deems the matter suitable for decision on the moving papers, and VACATES the hearing

17

scheduled for August 19, 2016.

18

IT IS SO ORDERED.

19
20

Dated: August 2, 2016
MAXINE M. CHESNEY
United States District Judge

21
22
23
24
25
26
1

27
28

Pursuant to the Civil Local Rules of this District, any opposition was due no later
than July 28, 2016. See Civil L. R. 7-3(a) (providing opposition "must be filed and served
not more than 14 days after the motion was filed").