Synchronoss Technologies v. Dropbox Inc

Filing 105

ORDER FOR SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEFING. Signed by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. on 5/19/2016. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/19/2016)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 SYNCHRONOSS TECHNOLOGIES, INC., Plaintiff, 8 DROPBOX INC., et al., Defendants. 11 United States District Court Northern District of California ORDER FOR SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEFING v. 9 10 Case No. 16-cv-00119-HSG On April 28, 2016, the Court held a hearing on Defendant’s motion to dismiss. Dkt. No. 12 13 81. Defendant brought its motion on the basis that U.S. Patent Nos. 6,671,757; 7,587,446; and 14 6,757,696 are invalid under 35 U.S.C. § 101. On May 12, 2016, the Federal Circuit issued a 15 decision in Enfish, LLC v. Microsoft Corp., No. 2015-1244, 2016 WL 2756255 (Fed. Cir. May 12, 16 2016). 17 The parties are directed to submit simultaneous supplemental briefing on the import of 18 Enfish on the pending motion to dismiss. The parties shall file briefs of no more than 5 pages on 19 or before May 27, 2016. 20 21 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: 5/19/2016 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR. United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?