Synchronoss Technologies v. Dropbox Inc

Filing 121

ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 120 Stipulation To Change Time. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/24/2017)

1 SARAH S. ESKANDARI (SBN 271541)
DENTONS US LLP
2 One Market Plaza
Spear Tower, 24th Floor
3 San Francisco, California 94105
Telephone: [phone]
4 Facsimile: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
5
Attorneys for Plaintiff
6 SYNCHRONOSS TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
7
STEPHEN E. TAYLOR (SBN 58452)
8 JONATHAN A. PATCHEN (SBN 237346)
TAYLOR & PATCHEN, LLP
9 One Ferry Building, Suite 355
San Francisco, California 94111
10 Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
11 E-mail: [e-mail]
E-mail: [e-mail]
12
Attorneys for Defendant
13 DROPBOX, INC.
14
15
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
16
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
17
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
18
19
SYNCHRONOSS TECHNOLOGIES, INC.,

Case No.: 3:16-CV-00119-HSG

20
Plaintiff,
21
v.

STIPULATED REQUEST FOR ORDER
CHANGING TIME AND ORDER

DROPBOX, INC.,

[CIVIL LOCAL RULE 6-2]

22
23
Defendant.

Honorable Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr.

24
25

Complaint Filed: March 27, 2015
Case Transferred: January 8, 2016

26
27
28
STIPULATED REQUEST FOR ORDER CHANGING TIME AND [PROPOSED] ORDER:
CASE NO. 3:16-CV-00119-HSG

1

Defendant Dropbox, Inc. (“Dropbox”) and Plaintiff Synchronoss Technologies, Inc.

2 (“Synchronoss”), collectively (the “Parties”), by and through their respective counsel and
3 subject to the Court’s approval, have met and conferred and stipulate as follows:
4

WHEREAS, on January 4, 2017, the Court issued an Order Setting Schedule that set a

5 January 23, 2017 deadline for the Parties to submit an ESI Stipulation and Protective Order
6 (ECF 116).
7

WHEREAS, in light of the fact that, to date, the Parties continue to negotiate the ESI

8 Stipulation and Protective Order, and due to the intervening holidays of Martin Luther King,
9 Jr. and the Presidential Inauguration, there is good cause to extend the date for the Parties to
10 submit their ESI Order and Protective Order by one week, from January 23, 2017, to and
11 including January 30, 2017.
12

WHEREAS, there have only been two prior time modifications in this case: (1) when

13 the Court granted Synchronoss’ motion for an extension of time to respond to Dropbox’s
14 original February 5, 2016 motion to dismiss (ECF 70, 71) and (2) when the Court granted the
15 Parties’ Stipulated Request for an extension of time for Dropbox to file its reply in support of
16 the Motion to Dismiss (ECF 90, 91);
17

WHEREAS, the Parties’ requested extension will have no impact on the schedule for

18 the case overall, as the remaining deadlines in the Scheduling Order will be unaffected; the
19 requested one-week extension will leave the Parties with two (2) weeks prior to the February
20 15, 2017 due date for Synchronoss’ Disclosure of Asserted Claims and Infringement
21 Contentions and accompanying document production, per Patent Local Rules 3-1 and 3-2 and
22 the Order Setting Schedule (ECF 116); and the brief extension will not prejudice any Party.
23 ///
24 ///
25 ///
26 ///
27 ///
28 ///
2.
STIPULATED REQUEST FOR ORDER CHANGING TIME AND [PROPOSED] ORDER:
CASE NO. 3:16-CV-00119-HSG

1

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, BY AND

2 BETWEEN THE PARTIES THROUGH THEIR RESPECTIVE COUNSEL, THAT subject to the
3 Court’s approval: The date for the Parties to file their ESI Stipulation and Protective Order is
4 extended from January 23, 2017, to and including January 30, 2017.
5
6 Dated: January 23, 2017

DENTONS US LLP

7
8

By:
/s/ Sarah S. Eskandari
SARAH S. ESKANDARI (SBN 271541)
One Market Plaza,
Spear Tower, 24th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94105
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]

9
10
11
12
13

Attorneys for Plaintiff
Synchronoss Technologies, Inc.

14
15
Dated: January 23, 2017

TAYLOR & PATCHEN, LLP

16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24

By:
/s/ Jonathan A. Patchen
STEPHEN E. TAYLOR (SBN 058452)
JONATHAN A. PATCHEN (SBN 237346)
One Ferry Building, Suite 355
San Francisco, CA 94111
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
E-mail: [e-mail]
E-mail: [e-mail]
Attorneys for Defendant
Dropbox, Inc.

25
26
27
28
3.
STIPULATED REQUEST FOR ORDER CHANGING TIME AND [PROPOSED] ORDER:
CASE NO. 3:16-CV-00119-HSG

ORDER

1
2
3

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

4
5 Dated: January 24, 2017
6

__________________________________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
HONORABLE HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR.

7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
4.
STIPULATED REQUEST FOR ORDER CHANGING TIME AND [PROPOSED] ORDER:
CASE NO. 3:16-CV-00119-HSG

1

FILER’S ATTESTATION:

2

I, Sarah S. Eskandari, am the ECF user whose ID and password are being used to file

3

the above STIPULATED REQUEST FOR ORDER CHANGING TIME AND

4

[PROPOSED] ORDER [CIVIL LOCAL RULE 6-2]. In compliance with Civil Local Rule

5

5-1(i)(3), I hereby attest that each listed counsel above has concurred in this filing.

6
7
8

Dated: January 23, 2017

By

/s/ Sarah S. Eskandari
SARAH S. ESKANDARI

9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
5.
STIPULATED REQUEST FOR ORDER CHANGING TIME AND [PROPOSED] ORDER:
CASE NO. 3:16-CV-00119-HSG