Synchronoss Technologies v. Dropbox Inc
ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 61 Motion for Pro Hac Vice for Andrew M. Grodin. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/9/2016)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Case No: l6-cv-00119
ADMISSION OF ATTORNEY
PRO HAC VICE
(CIVIL LOCAL RULE 11-3)
j, Andrew M. Grodin
an active member in good standing of the bar of
hereby respectfully apply for admission to practice pro hac vice in the
Northern District of California representing: Synchronoss Technologies
above-entitled action. My local co-counsel in this case is Sarah S. Eskandari
attorney who is a member of the bar of this Court in good standing and who maintains an office
within the State of California.
M~ ADDRESS OF RECORD:
LOCAL CO-COUNSEL’S ADDRESS OF RECORD:
101 JFK Parkway, Short Hills, NJ 07078-2708
525 Market Street, 26th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94105
Mi TELEPHONE # OF RECORD:
LOCAL CO-COUNSEL’S TELEPHONE
I am an active member in good standing of a United States Court or of the highest court of
another State or the District of Columbia, as indicated above; my bar number iS: 018382003
A true and correct copy of a certificate of good standing or equivalent official document from said
bar is attached to this application.
I agree to familiarize myself with, and abide by, the Local Rules of this Court, especially the
Standards of Professional Conduct for attorneys and the Alternative Dispute Resolution Local Rules.
M~ EMAIL ADDRESS OF RECORD:
it OF RECORD:
LOCAL CO-COUNSEL’S EMAIL ADDRESSOF RECORD:
I declare under penalty of peijury that the foregoing is true and correct.
Andrew M. Grodin
ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION
FOR ADMISSION OF ATTORNEY PRO HAC VICE
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the application of Andrew M. Grodin
subject to the terms and conditions of Civil L.R. 11-3. All papers filed by the attorney must indicate
appearance pro hac vice. Service of papers upon, and communication with, local co-counsel
designated in the application will constitute notice to the party.
UNITED STATES DISTRICI/ MAGISTRATE JUDGE
PRO I-IA C VICE APPLICATION & ORDER
~uprcme €onrt of i~cba 51cr~ep
QCertititate of ~oob ~tanbin~
This is to certify that
ANDREW M GRODIN
018382003 ) was const ituteci anlappointelanl4ttorney at Law ofSKew
December 12, 2003
aiza~ as such,
has heen acimittecito practice hefore the Supreme Court anciali other courts of til is State
as an}4ttorney at Law, according to its laws, ivIes, anti customs.
Ifurt her certjfy that as of this late, the aôove-namelis an Attorney at Law in
gootistanding. ¶Forthepuipose of this Certificate, an attorney is in “goocistancling” ~
the Court’s records reflect that the attorney: 1)is current with atTassessments imposelas a
part of the filing of the annualAttorney cR.çgistration Statement, including, hut not
limitelto, allohlzqations to the SKew Jersey Lauolers’ (Funcifor Client Protection; 2) is not
suspended ord?sbarreifrom the practice of law; 3) has not resigneifrom the (Bar of this
State; anci4) has not heen transferred to cDisahi(ity Inactive status pursuant to ~ulè 1:2 012.
crlease note that this C’er4frcate does not constitute confirmation ofan attorney’s
satisfaction ofthe administrative requirements ofRjsle 1:21-1(a)foreligiôility to practice
law in this State.
In testimony whereçf I have
hereunto set my Izaniani
affi~ec1the Sealof the
Supreme Court, at ‘Trenton, this
cler&of the Supreme Court
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?