Synchronoss Technologies v. Dropbox Inc

Filing 91

ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 90 Stipulation TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANT DROPBOX, INC. TO FILE REPLY IN SUPPORT OF 81 MOTION TO DISMISS [CIVIL LOCAL RULE 6-2].(ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/29/2016)

1 THOMAS H.L. SELBY (pro hac vice)
DAVID M. KRINSKY (pro hac vice)
2 ADAM D. HARBER (pro hac vice)
CHRISTOPHER J. MANDERNACH (pro hac vice)
3 WILLIAMS & CONNOLLY LLP
725 Twelfth Street, N.W.
4 Washington, D.C. 20005
Telephone: [phone]
5 Facsimile: [phone]
E-mail: [e-mail]
6 E-mail: [e-mail]
E-mail: [e-mail]
7 E-mail: [e-mail]
8 STEPHEN E. TAYLOR (SBN 058452)
JONATHAN A. PATCHEN (SBN 237346)
9 TAYLOR & COMPANY LAW OFFICES, LLP
One Ferry Building, Suite 355
10 San Francisco, CA 94111
Telephone: [phone]
11 Facsimile: [phone]
E-mail: [e-mail]
12 E-mail: [e-mail]
13 Attorneys for Defendant
DROPBOX, INC.
14
15

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

16

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

17

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

18
SYNCHRONOSS TECHNOLOGIES, INC.,

Case No.: 16-cv-00119-HSG

19
Plaintiff,
20
v.
21
DROPBOX, INC.,

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND
TIME FOR DEFENDANT DROPBOX, INC.
TO
FILE REPLY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION
TO DISMISS [CIVIL LOCAL RULE 6-2]

22
Defendant.
23

Date: April 28, 2016
Time: 2:00 PM
Place: Courtroom 15, 18th Floor

24
25

Complaint Filed: March 27, 2015
Case Transferred: January 8, 2016
Trial Date: None Set

26
Honorable Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr.
27
28
TAYLOR & CO.
LAW OFFICES, LLP

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANT DROPBOX, INC.
TO FILE REPLY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO DISMISS: CASE NO. 16-cv-00119-HSG

1

Defendant Dropbox, Inc. (“Dropbox”) and Plaintiff Synchronoss Technologies, Inc.

2 (“Synchronoss”), by and through their respective counsel and subject to the Court’s approval, have
3 met conferred and hereby stipulate as follows:
4

WHEREAS, in light of the Easter holiday and conflicting deadlines facing counsel for

5 Dropbox, there is good cause to extend the date for Dropbox’s reply in support of its pending
6 Motion to Dismiss (ECF 81) by one week, from March 31, 2016 to and including April 7, 2016;
7

WHEREAS, there has only been one prior time modification in this case when the Court

8 granted Synchronoss’ motion for an extension of time to respond to Dropbox’s original February
9 5, 2016 motion to dismiss (ECF 70, 71);
10

WHEREAS, the parties’ requested extension will have no impact on the schedule for the

11 case or the Motion’s April 28, 2016 hearing date; the requested one-week extension will still leave
12 the Court with three (3) weeks to review all of the papers submitted in support of and in
13 opposition to the Motion, and prepare for the hearing; and the brief extension will not prevent the
14 Motion from being fully briefed before the April 12 Initial Case Management Conference;
15 ///
16 ///
17 ///
18 ///
19 ///
20 ///
21 ///
22 ///
23 ///
24 ///
25 ///
26 ///
27 ///
28 ///
TAYLOR & CO.
LAW OFFICES, LLP

2.
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANT DROPBOX, INC.
TO FILE REPLY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO DISMISS: CASE NO. 16-cv-00119-HSG

1

NOW, THEREFOR, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, BY AND

2 BETWEEN THE PARTIES THROUGH THEIR RESPECTIVE COUNSEL, THAT subject to the
3 Court’s approval: The date for Defendant Dropbox to file its reply in support of the currently
4 pending Motion to Dismiss (ECF 81) is extended from March 31, 2016, to and including April 7,
5 2016.
6
7 Dated: March 29, 2016

TAYLOR & COMPANY LAW OFFICES, LLP

8
9

By:

/s/ Jonathan A. Patchen
Jonathan A. Patchen
Attorneys for Defendant DROPBOX, INC.

10
11
12 Dated: March 29, 2016

DENTONS US LLP

13
14
By:

/s/ Shailendra K. Maheshwari
Shailendra K. Maheshwari
Attorneys for Plaintiff SYNCHRONOSS
TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

15
16
17
18
19

ORDER
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

20
21
22 DATED: March 29, 2016
23

_______________________________________
HONORABLE HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

24
25
26
27
28
TAYLOR & CO.
LAW OFFICES, LLP

3.
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANT DROPBOX, INC.
TO FILE REPLY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO DISMISS: CASE NO. 16-cv-00119-HSG

1
2

ATTESTATION
I, Jonathan A. Patchen, am the ECF user whose ID an password are being used to file the

3 above STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FOR
4 DEFENDANT DROPBOX, INC. TO FILE REPLY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO
5 DISMISS. In compliance with Civil Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), I hereby attest that each listed counsel
6 above has concurred in this filing.
7
8

By:

/s/ Jonathan A. Patchen
Jonathan A. Patchen

9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
TAYLOR & CO.
LAW OFFICES, LLP

4.
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANT DROPBOX, INC.
TO FILE REPLY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO DISMISS: CASE NO. 16-cv-00119-HSG