Synchronoss Technologies, Inc. v. Egnyte, Inc.

Filing 66

ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting (65) Stipulation in Case 3:16-cv-00120-HSG; (78) in Case 3:16-cv-02026-HSG to Continue Case. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/27/2017)

1
2
3
4
5
6

DURIE TANGRI LLP
SONALI D. MAITRA (SBN 254896)
[e-mail]
TIMOTHY C. SAULSBURY (SBN 281434)
[e-mail]
CATHERINE Y. KIM (SBN 308442)
[e-mail]
217 Leidesdorff Street
San Francisco, CA 94111
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

7
8
9

Attorneys for Defendant
FUNAMBOL, INC.

13

NEIL A. SMITH (SBN 63777)
RIMON P.C.
One Embarcadero Center, Suite 400
San Francisco, CA 94111
Phone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]

14

Attorneys for Defendant EGNYTE, INC.

15

SARAH S. ESKANDARI (SBN 271541)
DENTONS US LLP
One Market Plaza
Spear Tower, 24th Floor
San Francisco, California 94105
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
MARK L. HOGGE (Pro Hac Vice)
SHAILENDRA K. MAHESHWARI (Pro Hac Vice)
NICHOLAS H. JACKSON (SBN 269976)
DENTONS US LLP
1900 K Street, N.W.
Washington, DC 20006
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
Email: [e-mail]
Email: [e-mail]

(Additional Counsel Listed on Following Page)

10
11
12

16

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

17

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

18
19

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
SYNCHRONOSS TECHNOLOGIES, INC.,

20
21
22

Plaintiff,
v.

Defendant.
SYNCHRONOSS TECHNOLOGIES, INC.,
Plaintiff,

25
26

Case No. 3:16-cv-02026-HSG
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE
CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
[CIVIL LOCAL RULE 6-2]

FUNAMBOL, INC.,

23
24

Attorneys for Plaintiff
SYNCHRONOSS TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

Date:
Time:
Ctrm:
Judge:

February 14, 2017
2:00 p.m.
10, 19th Floor
Honorable Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr.

Case No. 3:16-cv-00120-HSG

v.
EGNYTE, INC.,

27
Defendant.
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
CASE NOS. 3:16-CV-02026-HSG AND 3:16-CV-00120-HSG

1

6

RYAN T. BEARD (Pro Hac Vice)
ERIC B. MEYERTONS (Pro Hac Vice)
DWAYNE K. GOETZEL (Pro Hac Vice)
MEYERTONS, HOOD, KOWERT & GOETZEL P.C.
1120 S. Capital of Texas Hwy.
Building 2, Suite 300
Austin, Texas 78746
Telephone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]

7

Attorneys for Defendant EGNYTE, INC.

2
3
4
5

8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
CASE NOS. 3:16-CV-02026-HSG AND 3:16-CV-00120-HSG

1

Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 6-2, Plaintiff, Synchronoss Technologies, Inc. (“Synchronoss” or

2

“Plaintiff”), and Defendants Funambol, Inc. (“Funambol”) and Egnyte, Inc. (“Egnyte”) (collectively, the

3

“Parties”), by and through their respective counsel and subject to the Court’s approval, have met and

4

conferred and respectfully request that the Court enter the following stipulation to continue the date of

5

the Case Management Conference.

6

I.

FACTUAL BACKGROUND

7

In support of this stipulation, the undersigned Parties provide the following facts:

8

A.

9
10
11

On April 20, 2016, this matter (“Funambol”) was transferred to this District from the

United States District Court of New Jersey and reassigned to United States District Court Magistrate
Judge Nathanael M. Cousins. (ECF 41).
B.

On May 16, 2016, Funambol filed, pursuant to Civil Local Rule 3-12, an administrative

12

motion to consider whether this case should be related to two cases currently pending before Judge

13

Gilliam: (1) Synchronoss Techs., Inc. v. Dropbox, Inc., Case No. 16-cv-00119-HSG; and (2) Synchronoss

14

Techs., Inc. v. Egnyte, Inc., Case No. 16-cv-00120-HSG (“Egnyte”). See Synchronoss Techs., Inc. v.

15

Dropbox, Inc., Case No. 16-cv-00119-HSG. (ECF 104). On May 25, 2016, this Court granted

16

Funambol’s administrative motion and issued an order relating this matter to the Egnyte and Dropbox

17

matters. (ECF 106).

18

C.

On January 19, 2017, the Court issued an Order Setting Case Management Conference

19

and ADR Deadlines, setting the Case Management Conference for February 14, 2017 at 2:00 p.m., and

20

setting related deadlines based on that date for both the Funambol and Egnyte actions. (Case No. 3:16-

21

cv-02026-HSG at ECF 76; Case No. 16-cv-00120-HSG at ECF 64).

22
23
24

D.

Lead counsel for Funambol is not available on February 14, 2017 at 2:00 p.m. to attend

the Case Management Conference due to a scheduling conflict.
E.

Based on these facts, there is good cause to grant the requested extension because the

25

Parties believe a continuance is necessary in order to give them adequate time to meet and confer on the

26

relevant issues. Further, the Parties believe a continuance would be in the interest of judicial economy,

27

conserve the Court’s and the Parties’ resources, and allow for a more efficient and productive discussion

28

with the Court.
1
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
CASE NOS. 3:16-CV-02026-HSG AND 3:16-CV-00120-HSG

1

F.

On January 23, 2017, in an email exchange, counsel for Synchronoss and Funambol met

2

and conferred and agreed to request a continuance of the Case Management Conference to February 28,

3

2017 or a later date, subject to the convenience of the court.

4

G.

On January 23, 2017, in an email exchange, counsel for Funambol also met and conferred

5

with counsel for Egnyte to obtain their concurrence to continue the Case Management Conference in the

6

related case Synchronoss Techs., Inc. v. Egnyte, Inc., Case No. 16-cv-00120-HSG. Counsel for Egnyte

7

concurs in the Parties’ request to continue the Case Management Conferences in both the Funambol and

8

Egnyte actions to February 28, 2017 or a later date, subject to the convenience of the court.

9

H.

10

schedule.

11

I.

The Parties agree that this stipulation does not modify any other deadlines in the case

Synchronoss and Funambol previously requested two two-week extensions in the

12

Funambol action with respect to the Case Management Conference: 1) pending the Court’s decision on

13

the administrative motion to relate the case to Dropbox and Egnyte, and 2) pending the Court’s decision

14

on Dropbox’s Motion to Dismiss in the related matter Synchronoss v. Dropbox, Case No. 16-cv-00119-

15

HSG. (ECF 52, 57). See Civil L.R. 6-2(a)(2).

16

J.

17

action.

18

II.

Synchronoss and Egnyte have not yet requested any extensions of time in the Egnyte

19
20

STIPULATION
In light of the above facts, the Parties, by and through their respective counsel, jointly request that

the Court enter the following stipulation as an Order of the Court:

21

A.

The Case Management Conferences in both Synchronoss Techs., Inc. v. Funambol, Inc.,

22

Case No. 16-cv-02026-HSG, and Synchronoss Techs., Inc. v. Egnyte, Inc., Case No. 16-cv-00120-HSG

23

shall be continued to February 28, 2017 at 2:00 p.m. or a later date subject to the convenience of the

24

Court.

25
26
27
28
2
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
CASE NOS. 3:16-CV-02026-HSG AND 3:16-CV-00120-HSG

1

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

2
3

Dated: January 27, 2017

DURIE TANGRI LLP

4
By:

/s/ Catherine Y. Kim
SONALI D. MAITRA
TIMOTHY C. SAULSBURY
CATHERINE Y. KIM

5
6
7

Attorneys for Defendant
FUNAMBOL, INC.

8
9

Dated: January 27, 2017

DENTONS US LLP

10
By:

11

/s/ Sarah S. Eskandari
SARAH S. ESKANDARI
MARK L. HOGGE
SHAILENDRA MAHESHWARI
NICHOLAS H. JACKSON

12
13

Attorneys for Plaintiff
SYNCHRONOSS TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

14
15
16
17

Dated: January 27, 2017

MEYERTONS, HOOD, KOWERT & GOETZEL P.C.
By:

/s/ Ryan T. Beard
RYAN T. BEARD
ERIC B. MEYERTONS
DWAYNE K. GOETZEL

18
19
20
21

Attorneys for Defendant
EGNYTE, INC.

22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
CASE NOS. 3:16-CV-02026-HSG AND 3:16-CV-00120-HSG

1

ORDER

2

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

3
4

Dated: January 27, 2017
HONORABLE HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
4

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
CASE NOS. 3:16-CV-02026-HSG AND 3:16-CV-00120-HSG

1
2

FILER’S ATTESTATION
Pursuant to Civil L.R. 5-1(i)(3), regarding signatures, I, Catherine Y. Kim, attest that concurrence

3

in the filing of this document has been obtained.

4

Dated: January 27, 2017

5

/s/ Catherine Y. Kim
CATHERINE Y. KIM

6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
5
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
CASE NOS. 3:16-CV-02026-HSG AND 3:16-CV-00120-HSG