Chrimar Systems, Inc. et al v. Ruckus Wireless Inc.
Filing
99
ORDER CONTINUING STAY (Illston, Susan) (Filed on 2/16/2017)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7
CHRIMAR SYSTEMS INC, et al.,
Case No. 16-cv-00186-SI
Plaintiffs,
8
v.
ORDER CONTINUING STAY
9
10
RUCKUS WIRELESS, INC.,
Re: Dkt. No. 98
Defendant.
11
United States District Court
Northern District of California
____________________________________
12
v.
13
14
NETGEAR, INC.
Case No. 16-cv-00624-SI
Re: Dkt. No. 99
Defendant.
15
____________________________________
16
v.
17
18
FORTINET, INC,
Case No. 16-cv-00897-SI
Re: Dkt No. 75
Defendant.
19
____________________________________
20
v.
21
22
JUNIPER NETWORKS, INC.,
Case No. 16-cv-00558-SI
Re: Dkt. No. 80
Defendant.
23
On September 26, 2016, the Court entered an order granting defendants’ joint motion to
24
stay these related actions pending inter partes review and ex parte reexamination proceedings in
25
the USPTO (the “Stay Order”). Dkt. No. 96.1 On February 6, 2017, pursuant to the Stay Order,
26
the parties filed a joint status report updating the Court on the USPTO proceedings. Dkt. No. 98.
27
28
1
Citations to the docket refer to case number 16-cv-00186.
1
Having reviewed the parties’ joint status report, the Court hereby continues the stay of
2
these related actions. The parties are directed to file quarterly joint status updates with the Court,
3
beginning on June 1, 2017, until the Court lifts the stay.
4
5
6
7
8
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: February 16, 2017
______________________________________
SUSAN ILLSTON
United States District Judge
9
10
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?