Chrimar Systems, Inc. et al v. Ruckus Wireless Inc.

Filing 99

ORDER CONTINUING STAY (Illston, Susan) (Filed on 2/16/2017)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 CHRIMAR SYSTEMS INC, et al., Case No. 16-cv-00186-SI Plaintiffs, 8 v. ORDER CONTINUING STAY 9 10 RUCKUS WIRELESS, INC., Re: Dkt. No. 98 Defendant. 11 United States District Court Northern District of California ____________________________________ 12 v. 13 14 NETGEAR, INC. Case No. 16-cv-00624-SI Re: Dkt. No. 99 Defendant. 15 ____________________________________ 16 v. 17 18 FORTINET, INC, Case No. 16-cv-00897-SI Re: Dkt No. 75 Defendant. 19 ____________________________________ 20 v. 21 22 JUNIPER NETWORKS, INC., Case No. 16-cv-00558-SI Re: Dkt. No. 80 Defendant. 23 On September 26, 2016, the Court entered an order granting defendants’ joint motion to 24 stay these related actions pending inter partes review and ex parte reexamination proceedings in 25 the USPTO (the “Stay Order”). Dkt. No. 96.1 On February 6, 2017, pursuant to the Stay Order, 26 the parties filed a joint status report updating the Court on the USPTO proceedings. Dkt. No. 98. 27 28 1 Citations to the docket refer to case number 16-cv-00186. 1 Having reviewed the parties’ joint status report, the Court hereby continues the stay of 2 these related actions. The parties are directed to file quarterly joint status updates with the Court, 3 beginning on June 1, 2017, until the Court lifts the stay. 4 5 6 7 8 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: February 16, 2017 ______________________________________ SUSAN ILLSTON United States District Judge 9 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?