Fields v. Twitter, Inc.

Filing 30

ORDER granting 29 STIPULATION to Extend Motion to Dismiss Briefing Deadlines and Reschedule Hearing. Case Management Conference and motion hearings continued to 6/15/2016 02:00 PM in Courtroom 2, 17th Floor, San Francisco. Case Management Statement due by 6/8/2016. Responses to motions due by 5/4/2016. Replies due by 5/25/2016. Signed by Judge William H. Orrick on 04/11/2016. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/11/2016)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11

L. TIMOTHY FISHER (CA SBN 191626)
[e-mail]
JULIA A. LUSTER (CA SBN 295031)
[e-mail]
BURSOR & FISHER
1990 North California Boulevard, Suite 940
Walnut Creek, CA 94596
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
SCOTT A. BURSOR (CA SBN 276006)
[e-mail]
BURSOR & FISHER
888 Seventh Avenue
New York, NY 10019
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Attorneys for Plaintiff
TAMARA FIELDS, et al.

SETH P. WAXMAN (pro hac vice)
[e-mail]
PATRICK J. CAROME (pro hac vice)
[e-mail]
WILMER CUTLER PICKERING
HALE AND DORR LLP
1875 Pennsylvania Avenue
Washington, D.C. 20006
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
MARK D. FLANAGAN (CA SBN 130303)
[e-mail]
WILMER CUTLER PICKERING
HALE AND DORR LLP
950 Page Mill Road
Palo Alto, California 94304
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Attorneys for Defendant
TWITTER, INC.

12
13
14
15

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

16

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

17
18

TAMARA FIELDS, et al.,
Plaintiffs,

19
20

v.

21

TWITTER, INC.

22

Defendant.

23

Case No. 3:16-cv-00213-WHO
STIPULATION AND
ORDER CONTINUING CASE
MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE,
HEARING ON TWITTER’S MOTION TO
DISMISS AMENDED COMPLAINT, AND
BRIEFING DEADLINES
Judge: Hon. William H. Orrick

24
[N.D. Cal. Civil L.R. 6-2]

25
26
27
28
Case No. 3:16-cv-00213-WHO

Stipulation and Order Continuing
CMC, Hearing on Motion to Dismiss, and
Briefing Deadlines

1

WHEREAS, Plaintiff Fields filed the present lawsuit on January 13, 2016 (Dkt. No. 1);

2

WHEREAS, the Parties filed a Stipulation on February 3, 2016 for Defendant Twitter, Inc.

3

(“Twitter”) to File its Response to the Complaint, pursuant to Civil Local Rule 6-1(a), which

4

extended Twitter’s time to respond to the Complaint until March 10, 2016, and which did not require

5

a Court order (Dkt. No. 17);

6
7
8
9
10
11

WHEREAS, on March 10, 2016, Twitter filed its Motion to Dismiss the Complaint (Dkt. No.
20);
WHEREAS, on March 24, 2016, Plaintiffs Fields, et al. (“Plaintiffs”) filed the Amended
Complaint (Dkt. No. 21);
WHEREAS, on April 5, 2016, the Parties filed the Joint Case Management Statement (Dkt.
No. 25);

12

WHEREAS, on April 6, 2016, the Parties filed a Joint Statement Regarding Twitter’s

13

Request to Stay Discovery Pending Resolution of Twitter’s Motion to Dismiss the Amended

14

Complaint (Dkt. No. 26);

15
16
17

WHEREAS, also on April 6, 2016, Twitter filed its Motion to Dismiss the Amended
Complaint (Dkt. No. 27);
WHEREAS, on April 7, 2016, the Court entered an order granting Twitter’s Request to Stay

18

Discovery Pending Resolution of Twitter’s Motion to Dismiss the Amended Complaint and

19

continuing the Case Management Conference from April 12, 2016 until May 18, 2016, to be held in

20

conjunction with the hearing on Twitter’s Motion to Dismiss the Amended Complaint (Dkt. No. 28);

21

WHEREAS, the current deadline for Plaintiffs to respond to Twitter’s Motion to Dismiss the

22
23

Amended Complaint is April 20, 2016;
WHEREAS, counsel for Plaintiffs have requested a two-week extension of time within which

24

to file Plaintiffs’ Opposition to Twitter’s Motion to Dismiss the Amended Complaint, such that

25

Plaintiffs’ extended deadline would be May 4, 2016;

26
27

WHEREAS, counsel for Twitter wish to accommodate Plaintiffs’ request for an extension
but have several other obligations that would coincide with the adjusted deadline for Twitter’s Reply

28
Case No. 3:16-cv-00213-WHO

2

Stipulation and Order Continuing
CMC, Hearing on Motion to Dismiss, and
Briefing Deadlines

1

in Support of Twitter’s Motion to Dismiss the Amended Complaint that would make preparation of

2

Twitter’s Reply difficult absent an extension of time;

3

WHEREAS, counsel for Twitter have accordingly requested a two-week extension of time

4

within which to file Twitter’s Reply in Support of Twitter’s Motion to Dismiss the Amended

5

Complaint, such that Twitter’s extended deadline would be May 25, 2016;

6

WHEREAS, these extensions of time would require altering the date of the Case

7

Management Conference and hearing on Twitter’s Motion to Dismiss the Amended Complaint, such

8

that the Conference and hearing would be held on June 15, 2016;

9

WHEREAS, the Parties have consented to each of the requested two-week extensions, and

10

have agreed that a corresponding 28-day continuance of the Case Management Conference and

11

hearing on Twitter’s Motion to Dismiss the Amended Complaint would be appropriate and mutually

12

convenient;

13
14

NOW, THEREFORE, pursuant to Civil Local Rule 6-2(a), the Parties hereby stipulate and
agree, through their respective counsel, as follows:

15

1. The May 18, 2016 Case Management Conference and hearing on Twitter’s Motion to

16

Dismiss the Amended Complaint shall be rescheduled twenty-eight (28) days later on

17

June 15, 2016, or on another date that is convenient for the Court.

18

2. Plaintiffs’ deadline to file their Opposition to Twitter’s Motion to Dismiss the

19

Amended Complaint shall be extended by fourteen (14) days, to and including May

20

4, 2016, and Twitter’s deadline to file a Reply in Support of Twitter’s Motion to

21

Dismiss shall be extended to and including May 25, 2016.

22
23

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

24

//

25

//

26

//

27

//

28

//
Case No. 3:16-cv-00213-WHO

3

Stipulation and Order Continuing
CMC, Hearing on Motion to Dismiss, and
Briefing Deadlines

1

Dated: April 8, 2016

2
3

Respectfully submitted,

4

/s/ L. Timothy Fisher
L. TIMOTHY FISHER (CA SBN 191626)
[e-mail]
JULIA A. LUSTER (CA SBN 295031)
[e-mail]
BURSOR & FISHER
1990 North California Boulevard, Suite 940
Walnut Creek, CA 94596
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15

SCOTT A. BURSOR (CA SBN 276006)
[e-mail]
BURSOR & FISHER
888 Seventh Avenue
New York, NY 10019
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Attorneys for Plaintiff
TAMARA FIELDS, et al.

/s/ Seth P. Waxman
SETH P. WAXMAN (pro hac vice)
[e-mail]
PATRICK J. CAROME (pro hac vice)
[e-mail]
WILMER CUTLER PICKERING
HALE AND DORR LLP
1875 Pennsylvania Avenue
Washington, D.C. 20006
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
MARK D. FLANAGAN (CA SBN 130303)
[e-mail]
WILMER CUTLER PICKERING
HALE AND DORR LLP
950 Page Mill Road
Palo Alto, California 94304
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Attorneys for Defendant
TWITTER, INC.

16
17
18
19
20

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

21
22

April 11, 2016
DATED:____________

_________________________________________

WILLIAM H. ORRICK

23

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

24
25
26
27
28
Case No. 3:16-cv-00213-WHO

4

Stipulation and Order Continuing
CMC, Hearing on Motion to Dismiss, and
Briefing Deadlines