Oswald v. Humphreys, et al

Filing 24

ORDER granting re 23 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Continuing Hearing Date and Setting Briefing Schedule on Nominal Defendant Identiv, Inc.'s Motion to Dismiss filed by Ryan Oswald. Reset Deadl ines as to 22 MOTION to Dismiss . Responses due by 9/1/2016. Replies due by 9/30/2016. Motion to Dismiss Hearing reset for 10/14/2016 10:00 AM in Courtroom 6, 17th Floor, San Francisco before Hon. Charles R. Breyer. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 8/8/2016. (beS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/8/2016)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 ROBERT C. SCHUBERT 62684 WILLEM F. JONCKHEER 178748 SCHUBERT JONCKHEER & KOLBE LLP Three Embarcadero Center, Suite 1650 San Francisco, CA 94111 (415) 788-4220 7 ROBERT I. HARWOOD MATTHEW M. HOUSTON BENJAMIN I. SACHS-MICHAELS HARWOOD FEFFER LLP 488 Madison Avenue New York, NY 10022 (212) 935-7400 8 Attorneys for Plaintiff 5 6 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 12 13 RYAN OSWALD, Derivatively on Behalf of Nominal Defendant IDENTIV, INC., 14 Plaintiff, 15 16 17 18 vs. STEVEN HUMPHREYS, JASON HART, JAMES OUSLEY, GARY KREMEN, SAAD ALAZEM, DANIEL S. WENZEL, and BRIAN NELSON, 21 22 STIPULATION AND ORDER CONTINUING HEARING DATE AND SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON NOMINAL DEFENDANT IDENTIV, INC.’S MOTION TO DISMISS Judge: Hon. Charles R. Breyer Courtroom: 6 Defendants, 19 20 CASE NO. 3:16-CV-00241-CRB and IDENTIV, INC., Nominal Defendant. 23 24 25 26 27 28 CASE NO. 3:16-CV-00241-CRB STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING MTD HEARING & BRIEFING SCHEDULE 1 WHEREAS, this action is a shareholder derivative action filed on January 14, 2016; 2 WHEREAS, this action is factually related to a putative class action alleging violations of 3 federal securities laws that is also pending before this Court: Rok v. Identiv, et al., Case No. 15- 4 cv-05775-CRB (the “Securities Class Action”); 5 WHEREAS, on March 3, 2016, the Parties filed a Stipulation and Proposed Order 6 regarding a temporary stay of this action and setting a schedule for filing Plaintiff’s Amended 7 Complaint and Identiv, Inc.’s (“Identiv”) response to that complaint (Docket No. 14), which the 8 Court approved on March 8, 2016 (Docket No. 15); 9 WHEREAS, on June 17, 2016, Plaintiff filed his Amended Complaint (Docket No. 21); 10 11 WHEREAS, on August 1, 2016, Identiv filed its Motion to Dismiss and noticed a hearing on the Motion for September 16, 2016 (Docket No. 22); 12 13 WHEREAS, Plaintiff’s response to the Motion to Dismiss is currently due August 15, 2016; 14 WHEREAS, in light of the short period of time for Plaintiff to respond to the Motion to 15 Dismiss under the current briefing schedule and Plaintiff counsel’s pre-existing summer schedule, 16 as well as the Court’s current availability, Plaintiff has requested that Identiv agree to an 17 extension of the current briefing schedule and a continuance of the current hearing date; 18 WHEREAS, Identiv has no objection to this request; and 19 NOW, THEREFORE the Parties respectfully request that the Court enter an Order as 20 follows: 21 1. Plaintiff’s response in opposition to the Motion to Dismiss is due September 1, 23 2. Defendants’ reply in further support of the Motion to Dismiss is due September 24 30, 2016. 25 3. 22 2016. A hearing on the Motion to Dismiss will be held on October 14, 2016, or at 26 another date and time as the Court may order. 27 IT IS SO STIPULATED. 28 -1- CASE NO. 3:16-CV-00241-CRB STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING MTD HEARING & BRIEFING SCHEDULE 1 Dated: August 4, 2016 2 SCHUBERT JONCKHEER & KOLBE LLP Robert C. Schubert Willem F. Jonckheer 3 By: /s/ Willem F. Jonckheer WILLEM F. JONCKHEER 4 5 7 Robert I. Harwood Matthew M. Houston Benjamin I. Sachs-Michaels HARWOOD FEFFER LLP 8 Attorneys for Plaintiff Ryan Oswald 6 9 10 DATED: August 4, 2016 PAUL HASTINGS LLP 11 By: /s/ Christopher H. McGrath CHRISTOPHER H. MCGRATH 12 Attorneys for Nominal Defendant Identiv, Inc. 13 14 15 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 16 Dated: August 8, 2016 17 18 HONORABLE CHARLES R. BREYER 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -2- CASE NO. 3:16-CV-00241-CRB STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING MTD HEARING & BRIEFING SCHEDULE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?