Oswald v. Humphreys, et al
Filing
24
ORDER granting re 23 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Continuing Hearing Date and Setting Briefing Schedule on Nominal Defendant Identiv, Inc.'s Motion to Dismiss filed by Ryan Oswald. Reset Deadl ines as to 22 MOTION to Dismiss . Responses due by 9/1/2016. Replies due by 9/30/2016. Motion to Dismiss Hearing reset for 10/14/2016 10:00 AM in Courtroom 6, 17th Floor, San Francisco before Hon. Charles R. Breyer. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 8/8/2016. (beS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/8/2016)
1
2
3
4
ROBERT C. SCHUBERT 62684
WILLEM F. JONCKHEER 178748
SCHUBERT JONCKHEER & KOLBE LLP
Three Embarcadero Center, Suite 1650
San Francisco, CA 94111
(415) 788-4220
7
ROBERT I. HARWOOD
MATTHEW M. HOUSTON
BENJAMIN I. SACHS-MICHAELS
HARWOOD FEFFER LLP
488 Madison Avenue
New York, NY 10022
(212) 935-7400
8
Attorneys for Plaintiff
5
6
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11
12
13
RYAN OSWALD, Derivatively on Behalf of
Nominal Defendant IDENTIV, INC.,
14
Plaintiff,
15
16
17
18
vs.
STEVEN HUMPHREYS, JASON HART,
JAMES OUSLEY, GARY KREMEN, SAAD
ALAZEM, DANIEL S. WENZEL, and BRIAN
NELSON,
21
22
STIPULATION AND ORDER
CONTINUING HEARING DATE AND
SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON
NOMINAL DEFENDANT IDENTIV,
INC.’S MOTION TO DISMISS
Judge: Hon. Charles R. Breyer
Courtroom: 6
Defendants,
19
20
CASE NO. 3:16-CV-00241-CRB
and
IDENTIV, INC.,
Nominal Defendant.
23
24
25
26
27
28
CASE NO. 3:16-CV-00241-CRB
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
REGARDING MTD HEARING & BRIEFING
SCHEDULE
1
WHEREAS, this action is a shareholder derivative action filed on January 14, 2016;
2
WHEREAS, this action is factually related to a putative class action alleging violations of
3
federal securities laws that is also pending before this Court: Rok v. Identiv, et al., Case No. 15-
4
cv-05775-CRB (the “Securities Class Action”);
5
WHEREAS, on March 3, 2016, the Parties filed a Stipulation and Proposed Order
6
regarding a temporary stay of this action and setting a schedule for filing Plaintiff’s Amended
7
Complaint and Identiv, Inc.’s (“Identiv”) response to that complaint (Docket No. 14), which the
8
Court approved on March 8, 2016 (Docket No. 15);
9
WHEREAS, on June 17, 2016, Plaintiff filed his Amended Complaint (Docket No. 21);
10
11
WHEREAS, on August 1, 2016, Identiv filed its Motion to Dismiss and noticed a hearing
on the Motion for September 16, 2016 (Docket No. 22);
12
13
WHEREAS, Plaintiff’s response to the Motion to Dismiss is currently due August 15,
2016;
14
WHEREAS, in light of the short period of time for Plaintiff to respond to the Motion to
15
Dismiss under the current briefing schedule and Plaintiff counsel’s pre-existing summer schedule,
16
as well as the Court’s current availability, Plaintiff has requested that Identiv agree to an
17
extension of the current briefing schedule and a continuance of the current hearing date;
18
WHEREAS, Identiv has no objection to this request; and
19
NOW, THEREFORE the Parties respectfully request that the Court enter an Order as
20
follows:
21
1.
Plaintiff’s response in opposition to the Motion to Dismiss is due September 1,
23
2.
Defendants’ reply in further support of the Motion to Dismiss is due September
24
30, 2016.
25
3.
22
2016.
A hearing on the Motion to Dismiss will be held on October 14, 2016, or at
26
another date and time as the Court may order.
27
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
28
-1-
CASE NO. 3:16-CV-00241-CRB
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
REGARDING MTD HEARING &
BRIEFING SCHEDULE
1
Dated: August 4, 2016
2
SCHUBERT JONCKHEER & KOLBE LLP
Robert C. Schubert
Willem F. Jonckheer
3
By: /s/ Willem F. Jonckheer
WILLEM F. JONCKHEER
4
5
7
Robert I. Harwood
Matthew M. Houston
Benjamin I. Sachs-Michaels
HARWOOD FEFFER LLP
8
Attorneys for Plaintiff Ryan Oswald
6
9
10
DATED: August 4, 2016
PAUL HASTINGS LLP
11
By: /s/ Christopher H. McGrath
CHRISTOPHER H. MCGRATH
12
Attorneys for Nominal Defendant Identiv, Inc.
13
14
15
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
16
Dated: August 8, 2016
17
18
HONORABLE CHARLES R. BREYER
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2-
CASE NO. 3:16-CV-00241-CRB
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
REGARDING MTD HEARING &
BRIEFING SCHEDULE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?