Stephanie Pamintuan v. Bristol-Myers Squibb Company et al

Filing 61

ORDER VACATING ( 12 , 20 ) PRO HAC VICE ADMISSIONS AND DIRECTING PLAINTIFFS COUNSEL TO FILE AMENDED APPLICATIONS. Attorneys Megan J McKenzie and Munir R. Meghjee terminated. Signed by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. on 7/14/2016. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/14/2016)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 STEPHANIE PAMINTUAN, Plaintiff, 8 9 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 Case No. 16-cv-00254-HSG v. BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY, et al., Defendants. ORDER VACATING PRO HAC VICE ADMISSIONS AND DIRECTING PLAINTIFF’S COUNSEL TO FILE AMENDED APPLICATIONS Re. Dkt. Nos. 12 & 20 12 13 The Court previously granted two pro hac vice applications filed by Munir Meghjee and 14 Megan McKenzie, counsel for Plaintiff Stephanie Pamintuan (“Plaintiff”). Dkt. Nos. 12 & 20. In 15 their applications, Mr. Meghjee and Ms. McKenzie designated Gary Wilson as local counsel as 16 required under Civil Local Rules 3-4(a)(2) and 11-3(a)(3). Mr. Wilson later filed a letter with the 17 Court, stating that he believes his local counsel designation may be improper because he does not 18 personally maintain an office in California, only his firm does. Dkt. No. 56. To help rectify this 19 error, two members of Mr. Wilson’s firm who maintain an office in California filed a notice of 20 appearance. Dkt. No. 55. The Court appreciates Mr. Wilson’s candor and professionalism. To 21 resolve the issue, the Court hereby VACATES its earlier orders approving Mr. Meghjee and Ms. 22 McKenzie’s pro hac vice applications, Dkt. Nos. 12 & 20, and DIRECTS those attorneys to file 23 amended applications designating Mr. Wilson’s colleagues as local counsel by July 15, 2016. 24 25 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: 7/14/2016 26 27 28 HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR. United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?