Vickers v. J.C. Penney Corporation, Inc. et al
Filing
15
ORDER by Magistrate Judge Sallie Kim granting 14 Stipulation Re Joint Inspection. (sklc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/2/2016)
1
2
3
4
5
Tanya E. Moore, SBN 206683
MOORE LAW FIRM, P.C.
332 North Second Street
San Jose, California 95112
Telephone (408) 298-2000
Facsimile (408) 298-6046
Email: service@moorelawfirm.com
Attorney for Plaintiff
Cleveland Vickers
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
CLEVELAND VICKERS,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
15
vs.
J. C. PENNEY CORPORATION, INC. dba
JCPENNEY HILLTOP MALL, et al.,
16
Defendants.
17
18
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
No. 3:16-cv-00256-SK
STIPULATION TO CONTINUE LAST
DATE TO CONDUCT THE JOINT SITE
INSPECTION REQUIRED UNDER
GENERAL ORDER 56 AND THE
SCHEDULING ORDER; [PROPOSED]
ORDER
19
20
Plaintiff, Cleveland Vickers (“Plaintiff”), and Defendants, J.C. Penney Corporation and
21
J.C. Penney Properties, Inc. (“Defendants, and together with Plaintiff, “the Parties”), the parties
22
to this action, by and through their respective attorneys, hereby stipulate as follows:
1.
23
This action arises out of Plaintiff’s complaint that the property owned and
24
operates by Defendant does not comply with the requirements of Title III of the Americans with
25
Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 12181-12189, and thus is governed by this Court’s General Order
26
56.
27
28
2.
The Scheduling Order dated January 15, 2016 requires that the Parties conduct a
joint site inspection of the subject property by April 29, 2016 (Dkt. 4).
STIPULATION TO CONTINUE LAST DATE FOR JOINT SITE INSPECTION; [PROPOSED] ORDER
Page 1
1
2
3
3.
The Parties are engaging in settlement discussions and wish to exhaust such
efforts prior to the requirement that the joint site inspection take place.
4.
In addition, counsel for Defendants unexpectedly had to travel to the East Coast
4
due to a family emergency and has been unable to attend a joint site inspection prior to the
5
deadline.
6
5.
Accordingly, the Parties agree that the last date to conduct the site inspection be
7
continued from April 29, 2016 to May 27, 2016, and that all other dates in the Scheduling Order
8
triggered by the date of the site inspection also be continued accordingly.
9
10
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
11
12
Dated: April 29, 2016
MOORE LAW FIRM, P.C.
13
/s/ Tanya E. Moore
Tanya E. Moore
Attorney for Plaintiff,
Tina Huynh
14
15
16
17
18
Dated: April 29, 2016
MANNING & KASS
ELLROD, RAMIREZ, TRESTER LLP
19
20
21
22
/s/ David V. Roth
David V. Roth
Attorney for Defendants,
J.C. Penney Corporation and J.C. Penney
Properties, Inc.
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION TO CONTINUE LAST DATE FOR JOINT SITE INSPECTION; [PROPOSED] ORDER
Page 2
1
ORDER
2
The Parties having so stipulated and good cause appearing,
3
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the last date for the Parties to conduct the joint site
4
inspection required under General Order 56 and the Scheduling Order be continued from April
5
29, 2016 to May 27, 2016. All other dates triggered by the date of the joint site inspection shall
6
be continued accordingly.
7
8
IT IS SO ORDERED.
9
10
11
12
Dated: May 2, 2016
United States District Judge
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION TO CONTINUE LAST DATE FOR JOINT SITE INSPECTION; [PROPOSED] ORDER
Page 3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?