Vickers v. J.C. Penney Corporation, Inc. et al

Filing 15

ORDER by Magistrate Judge Sallie Kim granting 14 Stipulation Re Joint Inspection. (sklc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/2/2016)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 Tanya E. Moore, SBN 206683 MOORE LAW FIRM, P.C. 332 North Second Street San Jose, California 95112 Telephone (408) 298-2000 Facsimile (408) 298-6046 Email: service@moorelawfirm.com Attorney for Plaintiff Cleveland Vickers 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 CLEVELAND VICKERS, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 15 vs. J. C. PENNEY CORPORATION, INC. dba JCPENNEY HILLTOP MALL, et al., 16 Defendants. 17 18 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. 3:16-cv-00256-SK STIPULATION TO CONTINUE LAST DATE TO CONDUCT THE JOINT SITE INSPECTION REQUIRED UNDER GENERAL ORDER 56 AND THE SCHEDULING ORDER; [PROPOSED] ORDER 19 20 Plaintiff, Cleveland Vickers (“Plaintiff”), and Defendants, J.C. Penney Corporation and 21 J.C. Penney Properties, Inc. (“Defendants, and together with Plaintiff, “the Parties”), the parties 22 to this action, by and through their respective attorneys, hereby stipulate as follows: 1. 23 This action arises out of Plaintiff’s complaint that the property owned and 24 operates by Defendant does not comply with the requirements of Title III of the Americans with 25 Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 12181-12189, and thus is governed by this Court’s General Order 26 56. 27 28 2. The Scheduling Order dated January 15, 2016 requires that the Parties conduct a joint site inspection of the subject property by April 29, 2016 (Dkt. 4). STIPULATION TO CONTINUE LAST DATE FOR JOINT SITE INSPECTION; [PROPOSED] ORDER Page 1 1 2 3 3. The Parties are engaging in settlement discussions and wish to exhaust such efforts prior to the requirement that the joint site inspection take place. 4. In addition, counsel for Defendants unexpectedly had to travel to the East Coast 4 due to a family emergency and has been unable to attend a joint site inspection prior to the 5 deadline. 6 5. Accordingly, the Parties agree that the last date to conduct the site inspection be 7 continued from April 29, 2016 to May 27, 2016, and that all other dates in the Scheduling Order 8 triggered by the date of the site inspection also be continued accordingly. 9 10 IT IS SO STIPULATED. 11 12 Dated: April 29, 2016 MOORE LAW FIRM, P.C. 13 /s/ Tanya E. Moore Tanya E. Moore Attorney for Plaintiff, Tina Huynh 14 15 16 17 18 Dated: April 29, 2016 MANNING & KASS ELLROD, RAMIREZ, TRESTER LLP 19 20 21 22 /s/ David V. Roth David V. Roth Attorney for Defendants, J.C. Penney Corporation and J.C. Penney Properties, Inc. 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION TO CONTINUE LAST DATE FOR JOINT SITE INSPECTION; [PROPOSED] ORDER Page 2 1 ORDER 2 The Parties having so stipulated and good cause appearing, 3 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the last date for the Parties to conduct the joint site 4 inspection required under General Order 56 and the Scheduling Order be continued from April 5 29, 2016 to May 27, 2016. All other dates triggered by the date of the joint site inspection shall 6 be continued accordingly. 7 8 IT IS SO ORDERED. 9 10 11 12 Dated: May 2, 2016 United States District Judge 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION TO CONTINUE LAST DATE FOR JOINT SITE INSPECTION; [PROPOSED] ORDER Page 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?