United States of America v. Volkswagen AG et al
Filing
27
ORDER granting: (26 in 3:16-cv-00295-CRB) STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER to Extend Deadline to Respond to the Porsche Defendants' Partial (21) Motion to Dismiss filed by Porsche AG,et al., (1575 in 3:15-md-02672-CRB) STIPULATI ON WITH PROPOSED ORDER to Extend Deadline to Respond to the Porsche Defendants' Partial (1512) Motion to Dismiss. Set Deadlines as to ( 1512 in 3:15-md-02672-CRB); (21 in 3:16-cv-00295-CRB, 21 in 3:16-cv-00295-CRB) MOTION to Dismiss . > filed by DR. ING. h.c.F. Porsche AG, Porsche Cars North America, Inc. Responses due by 7/29/2016. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 6/16/2016. (beS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/16/2016)
1
CARI K. DAWSON (admitted pro hac vice)
cari.dawson@alston.com
2 ALSTON & BIRD LLP
One Atlantic Center
3 1201 West Peachtree Street
Atlanta, GA 30309-3424
4 Telephone: 404-881-7000
Facsimile: 404-881-7777
5
8
JOSHUA H. VAN EATON
josh.van.eaton@usdoj.gov
BETHANY ENGEL
bethany.engel@usdoj.gov
Environmental Enforcement Section
Environment and Natural Resources Division
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF
JUSTICE
P.O. Box 7611
Washington, DC 20044-7611
Telephone: (202) 514-6892
Facsimile: (202) 514-0097
9
Counsel for the United States
6 Liaison Counsel for the Porsche Defendants
7
10
11
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
12
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
14
IN RE: VOLKSWAGEN “CLEAN DIESEL”
MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES, AND
PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
15
THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO:
16
United States of America v. Volkswagen AG, et al.,
Case No. 3:16-cv-00295
13
MDL 2672
Case No. 3:15-MD-02672-CRB
The Honorable Charles R. Breyer
17
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND
DEADLINE TO RESPOND TO THE
PORSCHE DEFENDANTS’ PARTIAL
MOTION TO DISMISS
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND DEADLINE
LEGAL02/36474346v1
Case No. 3:15-MD-02672-CRB
1
WHEREAS, on February 25, 2016, the Court entered Pre-Trial Order No. 9 (Docket No.
2
1252), which, in Paragraph 3(A), required Defendants Volkswagen AG, Volkswagen Group of
3
America, Inc., Volkswagen Group of America Chattanooga Operations, LLC, Audi AG, Dr. Ing. h.c.
4
F. Porsche AG, and Porsche Cars North America, Inc. to answer, move to dismiss or otherwise
5
respond to the United States’ January 4, 2016 complaint (the “Complaint”) by April 15, 2016;
6
WHEREAS, on April 8, 2016, following stipulation and agreement among the parties, the
7
Court continued until May 16, 2016 the deadline for the Defendants to answer, move to dismiss or
8
otherwise respond to the Complaint;
9
WHEREAS, on May 16, 2016, Defendants Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG and Porsche Cars
10
North America, Inc. (the “Porsche Defendants”) filed a motion to dismiss Count 3 of the Complaint
11
(the “Motion”);
12
WHEREAS, the United States’ response to the Motion was previously due on May 31, 2016;
13
WHEREAS, on May 27, 2016, following stipulation and agreement among the parties, the
14 Court continued until June 20, 2016 the deadline for the United States to respond to the Motion;
15
16
17
WHEREAS, the Porsche Defendants and the United States have agreed to an additional
extension of time for the United States to respond to the Motion up to and including July 29, 2016;
WHEREAS, such extension will allow the parties additional time to work toward a just and
18 efficient resolution of this matter and will not impact the schedule for this case;
19
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and among the
20
United States and the Porsche Defendants, that the deadline for the United States to respond to the
21
Motion shall be continued until July 29, 2016.
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND DEADLINE
Case No. 3:15-MD-02672-CRB
1
Respectfully submitted,
2
3
DATED: June 16, 2016
4
ALSTON & BIRD LLP
By: /s/ Cari K. Dawson
Cari K. Dawson
5
Liaison Counsel for the Porsche Defendants
6
7
8
DATED: June 16, 2016
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
By: /s/ _Joshua H. Van Eaton_______
Joshua H. Van Eaton
9
Counsel for the United States
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND DEADLINE
Case No. 3:15-MD-02672-CRB
1
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
2
3
4
DATED: June 16, 2016.
_______________________________________
CHARLES R. BREYER
United States District Judge
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND DEADLINE
Case No. 3:15-MD-02672-CRB
1
2
3
ATTESTATION (CIVIL LOCAL RULE 5-1(i)(3))
In accordance with Civil Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), I attest that concurrence in the filing of this
document has been obtained from the signatories.
4
5 Dated: June 16, 2016
ALSTON & BIRD LLP
6
By: /s/ Cari K. Dawson____________________
Cari K. Dawson
7
8
Liaison Counsel for the Porsche Defendants
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
4
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND DEADLINE
Case No. 3:15-MD-02672-CRB
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?