United States of America v. Volkswagen AG et al

Filing 27

ORDER granting: (26 in 3:16-cv-00295-CRB) STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER to Extend Deadline to Respond to the Porsche Defendants' Partial (21) Motion to Dismiss filed by Porsche AG,et al., (1575 in 3:15-md-02672-CRB) STIPULATI ON WITH PROPOSED ORDER to Extend Deadline to Respond to the Porsche Defendants' Partial (1512) Motion to Dismiss. Set Deadlines as to ( 1512 in 3:15-md-02672-CRB); (21 in 3:16-cv-00295-CRB, 21 in 3:16-cv-00295-CRB) MOTION to Dismiss . > filed by DR. ING. h.c.F. Porsche AG, Porsche Cars North America, Inc. Responses due by 7/29/2016. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 6/16/2016. (beS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/16/2016)

Download PDF
1 CARI K. DAWSON (admitted pro hac vice) cari.dawson@alston.com 2 ALSTON & BIRD LLP One Atlantic Center 3 1201 West Peachtree Street Atlanta, GA 30309-3424 4 Telephone: 404-881-7000 Facsimile: 404-881-7777 5 8 JOSHUA H. VAN EATON josh.van.eaton@usdoj.gov BETHANY ENGEL bethany.engel@usdoj.gov Environmental Enforcement Section Environment and Natural Resources Division UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE P.O. Box 7611 Washington, DC 20044-7611 Telephone: (202) 514-6892 Facsimile: (202) 514-0097 9 Counsel for the United States 6 Liaison Counsel for the Porsche Defendants 7 10 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 12 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 14 IN RE: VOLKSWAGEN “CLEAN DIESEL” MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES, AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION 15 THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO: 16 United States of America v. Volkswagen AG, et al., Case No. 3:16-cv-00295 13 MDL 2672 Case No. 3:15-MD-02672-CRB The Honorable Charles R. Breyer 17 STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND DEADLINE TO RESPOND TO THE PORSCHE DEFENDANTS’ PARTIAL MOTION TO DISMISS 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND DEADLINE LEGAL02/36474346v1 Case No. 3:15-MD-02672-CRB 1 WHEREAS, on February 25, 2016, the Court entered Pre-Trial Order No. 9 (Docket No. 2 1252), which, in Paragraph 3(A), required Defendants Volkswagen AG, Volkswagen Group of 3 America, Inc., Volkswagen Group of America Chattanooga Operations, LLC, Audi AG, Dr. Ing. h.c. 4 F. Porsche AG, and Porsche Cars North America, Inc. to answer, move to dismiss or otherwise 5 respond to the United States’ January 4, 2016 complaint (the “Complaint”) by April 15, 2016; 6 WHEREAS, on April 8, 2016, following stipulation and agreement among the parties, the 7 Court continued until May 16, 2016 the deadline for the Defendants to answer, move to dismiss or 8 otherwise respond to the Complaint; 9 WHEREAS, on May 16, 2016, Defendants Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG and Porsche Cars 10 North America, Inc. (the “Porsche Defendants”) filed a motion to dismiss Count 3 of the Complaint 11 (the “Motion”); 12 WHEREAS, the United States’ response to the Motion was previously due on May 31, 2016; 13 WHEREAS, on May 27, 2016, following stipulation and agreement among the parties, the 14 Court continued until June 20, 2016 the deadline for the United States to respond to the Motion; 15 16 17 WHEREAS, the Porsche Defendants and the United States have agreed to an additional extension of time for the United States to respond to the Motion up to and including July 29, 2016; WHEREAS, such extension will allow the parties additional time to work toward a just and 18 efficient resolution of this matter and will not impact the schedule for this case; 19 NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and among the 20 United States and the Porsche Defendants, that the deadline for the United States to respond to the 21 Motion shall be continued until July 29, 2016. 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND DEADLINE Case No. 3:15-MD-02672-CRB 1 Respectfully submitted, 2 3 DATED: June 16, 2016 4 ALSTON & BIRD LLP By: /s/ Cari K. Dawson Cari K. Dawson 5 Liaison Counsel for the Porsche Defendants 6 7 8 DATED: June 16, 2016 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA By: /s/ _Joshua H. Van Eaton_______ Joshua H. Van Eaton 9 Counsel for the United States 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND DEADLINE Case No. 3:15-MD-02672-CRB 1 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 2 3 4 DATED: June 16, 2016. _______________________________________ CHARLES R. BREYER United States District Judge 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND DEADLINE Case No. 3:15-MD-02672-CRB 1 2 3 ATTESTATION (CIVIL LOCAL RULE 5-1(i)(3)) In accordance with Civil Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), I attest that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from the signatories. 4 5 Dated: June 16, 2016 ALSTON & BIRD LLP 6 By: /s/ Cari K. Dawson____________________ Cari K. Dawson 7 8 Liaison Counsel for the Porsche Defendants 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 4 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND DEADLINE Case No. 3:15-MD-02672-CRB

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?