Chanel, Inc. v. Charles
Filing
17
ORDER TO CONTINUE INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND ADR DEADLINES: Re 16 Proposed Order filed by Chanel, Inc. Signed by Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler on 3/31/2016. (lsS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/31/2016)
NOEL M. COOK- CBN 122777
1 ncook@owe.com
2
Kathleen E. Letourneau- CBN 244747
kel@owe.com
3 OWEN, WICKERSHAM & ERICKSON, P.C.
455 Market Street, Suite 1910
4 San Francisco, CA 94105
Tel.: (415) 882-3200
5 Fax: 415-882-3232
6
BARBARA A. SOLOMON (admitted pro hac vice)
7 bsolomon@fzlz.com
EMILY WEISS (admitted pro hac vice)
8 eweiss@fzlz.com
FROSS ZELNICK LEHRMAN & ZISSU, P.C.
9 866 United Nations Plaza
10 New York, New York 10017
Tel:
11 Fax:
(212) 813-5900
(212) 813-5901
12 Attorneys for Plaintif!CHANEL, INC
13
14
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
15~----------~------------------~
16 CHANEL, INC., a New York corporation,
Case No. Case 3: 16-cv-00307-LB
17
Plaintiff,
18
v.
19
TERESA CHARLES a!k/a TERESA PORTER, an
20 individual, d/b/a SUITE888 and as CROQUIS
DECOR and DOES 1-10,
21
Defendants.
[PROPOSED] ORDER TO
CONTINUE INITIAL CASE
MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
AND ADR DEADLINES
22
23~----------------------------~
24
25
26
27
28
4
PLAINTIFF CHANEL, INC.'S REQUEST AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
TO CONTINUE INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND ADR DEADLINES
1
2
IT IS ORDERED that the Initial Case Management Conference and corresponding ADR
deadlines are continued. A revised scheduling order will be issued by the Court.
3
March 31, 2016
4 Dated: _ _ _ _ _ _ __ __
5
The Honorable Laurel Beeler
United States Magistrate Judge
6
7
8
9
10
11
S:\1 Clients\CHANEL\Pleadings\Request to Continue ADR.doc
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
5
PLAINTIFF CHANEL, INC.' S REQUEST AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
TO CONTINUE INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND ADR DEADLINES
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?