Chanel, Inc. v. Charles

Filing 17

ORDER TO CONTINUE INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND ADR DEADLINES: Re 16 Proposed Order filed by Chanel, Inc. Signed by Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler on 3/31/2016. (lsS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/31/2016)

Download PDF
NOEL M. COOK- CBN 122777 1 ncook@owe.com 2 Kathleen E. Letourneau- CBN 244747 kel@owe.com 3 OWEN, WICKERSHAM & ERICKSON, P.C. 455 Market Street, Suite 1910 4 San Francisco, CA 94105 Tel.: (415) 882-3200 5 Fax: 415-882-3232 6 BARBARA A. SOLOMON (admitted pro hac vice) 7 bsolomon@fzlz.com EMILY WEISS (admitted pro hac vice) 8 eweiss@fzlz.com FROSS ZELNICK LEHRMAN & ZISSU, P.C. 9 866 United Nations Plaza 10 New York, New York 10017 Tel: 11 Fax: (212) 813-5900 (212) 813-5901 12 Attorneys for Plaintif!CHANEL, INC 13 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 15~----------~------------------~ 16 CHANEL, INC., a New York corporation, Case No. Case 3: 16-cv-00307-LB 17 Plaintiff, 18 v. 19 TERESA CHARLES a!k/a TERESA PORTER, an 20 individual, d/b/a SUITE888 and as CROQUIS DECOR and DOES 1-10, 21 Defendants. [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND ADR DEADLINES 22 23~----------------------------~ 24 25 26 27 28 4 PLAINTIFF CHANEL, INC.'S REQUEST AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND ADR DEADLINES 1 2 IT IS ORDERED that the Initial Case Management Conference and corresponding ADR deadlines are continued. A revised scheduling order will be issued by the Court. 3 March 31, 2016 4 Dated: _ _ _ _ _ _ __ __ 5 The Honorable Laurel Beeler United States Magistrate Judge 6 7 8 9 10 11 S:\1 Clients\CHANEL\Pleadings\Request to Continue ADR.doc 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 5 PLAINTIFF CHANEL, INC.' S REQUEST AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND ADR DEADLINES

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?