Shiner et al v. Safeway Inc. et al

Filing 10

STIPULATION AND ORDER re (37 in 3:15-cv-05078-EMC and 3:15-cv-0114 EMC and 3:16-cv-318 EMC) STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER to Consolidate Cases and Permit Filing of Consolidated Complaint filed by Safeway Inc. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 3/9/16. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/8/2016). Signed by Judge Edward M.Chen on 3/8/16. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/8/2016)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 12 EHDER SOTO, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, 13 14 15 v. 17 18 Defendant. HENEY SHIHAD, an individual on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, 21 22 v. SAFEWAY, INC., and DOES 1 through 25, inclusive, Defendants. 23 24 25 Case No. 3:16-cv-00114-EMC Plaintiff, 19 20 [PROPOSED] ORDER CONSOLIDATING CASES AND PERMITTING FILING OF CONSOLIDATED COMPLAINT Hon. Edward M. Chen SAFEWAY, INC., 16 Case No. 3:15-cv-05078-EMC DAN SHINER, JULIE WHITSON, and MAURI SANDERS, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Case No. 3:16-cv-00318-EMC 26 Plaintiffs, 27 28 v. [PROPOSED] ORDER CASE NO. 3:15-CV-05078-EMC 1 2 SAFEWAY, INC., and THE VONS COMPANIES, INC., 3 Defendants. 4 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 (filed on November 5, 2015), (2) Shihad v. Safeway, Inc., Case No. 3:16-cv-00114-EMC (filed on January 8, 2015), and (3) Shiner v. Safeway, Inc., et al., Case No. 3:16-cv-00318-EMC (filed on January 20, 2015) (collectively, “the Actions”). 2. The caption of the Actions and any subsequently consolidated litigation shall be “In re Safeway Tuna Cases” with the Master Docket and Master File being Case No. 3:15-cv05078-EMC, and the files of all subsequently consolidated actions shall be maintained under this case number. 4. Defendants shall have no obligation to answer or otherwise respond to the pending complaints. 5. No later than 30 days after the entry of this Order, Plaintiffs shall file and serve a Consolidated Complaint. The Consolidated Complaint shall serve as the operative pleading in the consolidated action. 6. Defendant shall respond, whether by answer, motion, or otherwise, to the Consolidated Complaint within 30 days of service. IT IS SO ORDERED. 23 3/9/2016 Date: ____________________ O IT IS S ORDER ED Chen . dward M _________________________________ Judge E The Honorable Edward M. Chen ER United States District Judge C NO 24 ISTRIC ES D TC AT T RT U O 22 Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 42(a): (1) Soto v. Safeway, Inc., Case No. 3:15-cv 05078-EMC R NIA 9 The following related actions assigned to this Court are consolidated pursuant to RT 25 FO 8 1. A H LI 7 Pursuant to the parties’ stipulation, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED as follows: S 6 UNIT ED 5 N 26 F D IS T IC T O R 27 28 -1- [PROPOSED] ORDER CASE NO. 3:15-CV-05078-EMC

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?