Koidal v. American Honda Finance Corporation et al

Filing 68

ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 66 Stipulation of Dismissal with Prejudice, Between Plaintiff and Defendant Travis Credit Union Only. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/26/2016)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 LAW OFFICE OF CLARK OVRUCHESKY Clark Ovruchesky, Esq. (301844) co@colawcalifornia.com 750 B. Street, Suite 3300 San Diego, California 92101 Telephone: (619) 356-8960 Attorneys for Plaintiff, Steve H. Koidal UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA STEVE H. KOIDAL, LAW OFFICE OF CLARK OVRUCHESKY 750 B. STREET, SUITE 3300 SAN DIEGO, CA 92101 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 Plaintiff, v. AMERICAN HONDA FINANCE CORPORATION, TRAVIS CREDIT UNION, WELLS FARGO AUTO FINANCE, INC., DELL FINANCIAL SERVICES L.L.C., CHASE BANK USA, N.A., EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC., EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES LLC, and TRANS UNION LLC., Case No.: 3:16-cv-0350-HSG STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE BETWEEN PLAINTIFF AND DEFENDANT TRAVIS CREDIT UNION ONLY HON. JUDGE HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR. Defendants. Plaintiff Steve H. Koidal (hereinafter “Plaintiff”) and Defendant Travis Credit Union (hereinafter “TCU”) (jointly hereinafter referred to as “the Parties”), 25 hereby stipulate to dismiss Defendant TCU only from the above-entitled action, 26 with prejudice, with each party to bear its own costs and attorneys’ fees. 27 28 STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL PAGE 1 OF 2 1 DATED: August 25, 2016 LAW OFFICE OF CLARK OVRUCHESKY 2 3 By: /s/ Clark Ovruchesky CLARK OVRUCHESKY, ESQ. ATTORNEY FOR PLAINTIFF 4 5 6 Respectfully submitted, DATED: August 25, 2016 LOMBARDI, LOPER, & CONANT 7 By: /s/ Leora R. Ragones Leora R. Ragones Attorneys for Defendant, Travis Credit Union 8 9 10 LAW OFFICE OF CLARK OVRUCHESKY 750 B. STREET, SUITE 3300 SAN DIEGO, CA 92101 11 12 13 SIGNATURE CERTIFICATION 14 Pursuant to Section 2(f)(4) of the Electronic Case Filing Administrative Policies and Procedures Manual, I hereby certify that the content of this document is acceptable to all defense counsels listed above, and that I have obtained their authorizations to affix their electronic signatures to this document. 15 16 17 18 Dated: August 25, 2016 LAW OFFICE OF CLARK OVRUCHESKY By: 19 20 /s/ Clark Ovruchesky Clark Ovruchesky ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF 21 22 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED that Defendant 23 Travis Credit Union is dismissed with prejudice. Plaintiff and Defendant Travis 24 Credit Union shall each bear their own costs and attorneys’ fees. 25 26 Date: _______________________ 8/26/2016 27 ____________________________________ HON. HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 28 STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL PAGE 2 OF 2 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE Koidal v. American Honda Finance Corporation et al Case No: No: 16-cv-00350-HSG 1 2 3 I, the undersigned, certify and declare that I am over the age of 18 years, 4 employed in the County of San Diego, State of California, and not a party to the 5 above-entitled cause. 6 On August 25, 2016, I served a true copy of: 7 8 9 10 • STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE BETWEEN PLAINTIFF AND DEFENDANT TRAVIS CREDIT UNION ONLY LAW OFFICE OF CLARK OVRUCHESKY 750 B. STREET, SUITE 3300 SAN DIEGO, CA 92101 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 [X] By ECF: On this date, I electronically filed the following document(s) with the Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF system, which sent electronic notification of such filing to all other parties appearing on the docket sheet. I declare under penalty of perjury that the above is true and correct (and that I am employed in or by the office of a member of the bar of this Court at whose direction the service was made). Executed on August 25, 2016 San Diego, CA. 19 20 By: /s/ Clark Ovruchesky CLARK OVRUCHESKY, ESQ. ATTORNEY FOR PLAINTIFF 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 PROOF OF SERVICE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?