Koidal v. American Honda Finance Corporation et al
Filing
73
ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 72 Stipulation of Dismissal with Prejudice, Between Plaintiff and Defendant Experian Information Solutions, Inc. Only. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/29/2016)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
LAW OFFICE OF CLARK OVRUCHESKY
Clark Ovruchesky, Esq. (301844)
co@colawcalifornia.com
750 B. Street, Suite 3300
San Diego, California 92101
Telephone: (619) 356-8960
Attorneys for Plaintiff,
Steve H. Koidal
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
STEVE H. KOIDAL,
LAW OFFICE OF CLARK OVRUCHESKY
750 B. STREET, SUITE 3300
SAN DIEGO, CA 92101
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
Plaintiff,
v.
AMERICAN HONDA FINANCE
CORPORATION, TRAVIS
CREDIT UNION, WELLS FARGO
AUTO FINANCE, INC., DELL
FINANCIAL SERVICES L.L.C.,
CHASE BANK USA, N.A.,
EXPERIAN INFORMATION
SOLUTIONS, INC., EQUIFAX
INFORMATION SERVICES LLC,
and TRANS UNION LLC.,
Case No.: 3:16-cv-0350-HSG
STIPULATION AND
[PROPOSED] ORDER OF
DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE
BETWEEN PLAINTIFF AND
DEFENDANT EXPERIAN
INFORMATION SOLUTIONS,
INC. ONLY
HON. JUDGE HAYWOOD S.
GILLIAM, JR.
Defendants.
Plaintiff Steve H. Koidal (hereinafter “Plaintiff”) and Defendant Experian
25
Information Solutions, Inc. (jointly hereinafter referred to as “the Parties”), hereby
26
stipulate to dismiss Defendant Experian only from the above-entitled action, with
27
28
prejudice, with each party to bear its own costs and attorneys’ fees.
STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL
PAGE 1 OF 2
1
DATED: September 28, 2016
Respectfully submitted,
2
LAW OFFICE OF CLARK OVRUCHESKY
3
4
By: /s/ Clark Ovruchesky
CLARK OVRUCHESKY, ESQ.
ATTORNEY FOR PLAINTIFF
5
6
7
8
DATED: September 28, 2016
9
By: /s/ Kelsey Israel-Trummel
Kelsey Israel-Trummel
Attorneys for Defendant,
Experian Information Solutions, Inc.
10
LAW OFFICE OF CLARK OVRUCHESKY
750 B. STREET, SUITE 3300
SAN DIEGO, CA 92101
11
12
SIGNATURE CERTIFICATION
13
14
15
16
JONES DAY
Pursuant to Section 2(f)(4) of the Electronic Case Filing Administrative Policies
and Procedures Manual, I hereby certify that the content of this document is
acceptable to all defense counsels listed above, and that I have obtained their
authorizations to affix their electronic signatures to this document.
17
18
Dated: September 28, 2016
19
LAW OFFICE OF CLARK OVRUCHESKY
By:
20
21
/s/ Clark Ovruchesky
Clark Ovruchesky
ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF
22
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED that Defendant
23
Experian Information Solutions, Inc. is dismissed with prejudice. Plaintiff and
24
Defendant Experian Information Solutions, Inc. shall each bear their own costs
25
and attorneys’ fees.
26
27
Date: _______________________
9/29/2016
28
STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL
____________________________________
HON. HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
PAGE 2 OF 2
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
Koidal v. American Honda Finance Corporation et al
Case No: No: 16-cv-00350-HSG
1
2
3
I, the undersigned, certify and declare that I am over the age of 18 years,
4
employed in the County of San Diego, State of California, and not a party to the
5
above-entitled cause.
6
On September 28, 2016, I served a true copy of:
7
8
9
10
• STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH
PREJUDICE BETWEEN PLAINTIFF AND DEFENDANT
EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC. ONLY
LAW OFFICE OF CLARK OVRUCHESKY
750 B. STREET, SUITE 3300
SAN DIEGO, CA 92101
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
[X]
By ECF: On this date, I electronically filed the following
document(s) with the Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF system, which sent
electronic notification of such filing to all other parties appearing on the docket
sheet.
I declare under penalty of perjury that the above is true and correct (and that
I am employed in or by the office of a member of the bar of this Court at whose
direction the service was made).
Executed on September 28, 2016 San Diego, CA.
19
20
By: /s/ Clark Ovruchesky
CLARK OVRUCHESKY, ESQ.
ATTORNEY FOR PLAINTIFF
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
PROOF OF SERVICE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?