AIDS Healthcare Foundation, Inc. v. Gilead Sciences, Inc. et al

Filing 23

ORDER DENYING PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION OF ATTORNEY JEFFREY S. CASHDAN by Hon. William Alsup denying 22 Motion for Pro Hac Vice.(whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/1/2016)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 8 9 12 13 14 15 No. C 16-0443 WHA Plaintiff, 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 AIDS HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION, INC., v. GILEAD SCIENCES, INC., JAPAN TOBACCO INC., JAPAN TOBACCO INTERNATIONAL U.S.A. INC., EMORY UNIVERSITY ORDER DENYING PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION OF ATTORNEY JEFFREY S. CASHDAN Defendants. / 16 17 The pro hac vice application of Attorney Jeffrey S. Cashdan (Dkt. No. 22) is DENIED for 18 failing to comply with Local Rule 11-3. The local rule requires that an applicant certify that “he 19 or she is an active member in good standing of the bar of a United States Court or of the highest 20 court of another State or the District of Columbia, specifying such bar” (emphasis added). 21 Filling out the pro hac vice form from the district court website such that it only identifies the 22 state of bar membership — such as “the bar of Georgia” — is inadequate under the local rule 23 because it fails to identify a specific court. While the application fee does not need to be paid 24 again, the application cannot be processed until a corrected form is submitted. 25 26 IT IS SO ORDERED. 27 28 Dated: March 1, 2016. WILLIAM ALSUP UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?