AIDS Healthcare Foundation, Inc. v. Gilead Sciences, Inc. et al

Filing 73

ORDER RE PAGE LIMITS FOR BRIEFS ON MOTIONS TO DISMISS by Hon. William Alsup granting 66 Stipulation.(whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/12/2016)

1
2
3
4
5

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

6
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
7
8
9

12
13
14
15

v.
GILEAD SCIENCES, INC., JAPAN
TOBACCO INC., JAPAN TOBACCO
INTERNATIONAL U.S.A. INC., EMORY
UNIVERSITY,

18
19

ORDER RE PAGE LIMITS
FOR BRIEFS ON MOTIONS
TO DISMISS

Defendants.
/

16
17

No. C 16-0443 WHA

Plaintiff,

11
For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10

AIDS HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION,
INC.,

The Court has reviewed the parties’ submissions regarding enargling the page limits on
briefs for the forthcoming motions to dismiss and the possibility of omnibus briefs.
The page limits shall be as follows:

20

•

Gilead’s motion: 30 PAGES.

21

•

Other motions: 25 PAGES.

22

•

AIDS Healthcare’s omnibus opposition: 60 PAGES.

23

•

Gilead’s reply: 18 PAGES.

24

•

Other replies: 15 PAGES.

25

To be clear, defendants may not file an omnibus reply. AIDS Healthcare should be clear

26

which arguments address which defendants, and defendants need only reply to the arguments

27

directed at them. If the total length of defendants’ briefs substantially exceeds the sixty pages

28

1

claimed in their joint statement, the Court will entertain a request for a further enlargement of

2

AIDS Healthcare’s page limit.

3
4

IT IS SO ORDERED.

5
6

Dated: May 12, 2016.

WILLIAM ALSUP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

7
8
9

11
For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

2