Troy Backus v. ConAgra, Inc.

Filing 36

REQUEST FOR RESPONSE RE AMENDED COMPLAINT (whalc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/17/2016)

1
2
3
4
5
6

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9

11
For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10

TROY BACKUS, on behalf of himself
and all others similarly situated,

12

Plaintiff,

13
14
15

No. C 16-00454 WHA

REQUEST FOR RESPONSE RE
AMENDED COMPLAINT

v.
CONAGRA FOODS, INC.,
Defendant.
/

16
17

In lieu of a response to defendant’s pending motion to dismiss, plaintiff filed an

18

amended complaint. By MAY 20, 2016, AT NOON, defendant shall please state whether the

19

motion to dismiss should be denied as moot without prejudice to a renewed motion directed at

20

the amended pleading or if it would prefer to continue with the present motion and address the

21

amendments in the reply. In either case, a new briefing schedule and hearing date will be set.

22
23

IT IS SO ORDERED.

24
25
26
27
28

Dated: May 17, 2016.

WILLIAM ALSUP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE